Peregrine wrote:So then why was it initially given a legal classification? Are your censors too incompetent to notice the obvious sex act until someone complains about it?
Edit: and their own ruling disproves your claim here.
Ah, well there you go. The law doesn't work like it was explained by the minister last time this stuff came up. It is in fact much worse because it really is stupidly subjective. That doesn't surprise me, but it does disappoint me.