Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Yodhrin wrote: Other people, myself included, think that's a pretty limited and boring way to go about things, and that it's far more enjoyable and challenging to build armies to a theme and then play the actual game on the actual table, rather than with a pen&paper.
You're making the common mistake of assuming that powerful lists and themed lists are mutually exclusive concepts. In reality most "themed" lists aren't any fluffier than an optimized competitive list, they just have lots of weak choices.
Yodhrin wrote: Other people, myself included, think that's a pretty limited and boring way to go about things, and that it's far more enjoyable and challenging to build armies to a theme and then play the actual game on the actual table, rather than with a pen&paper.
You're making the common mistake of assuming that powerful lists and themed lists are mutually exclusive concepts. In reality most "themed" lists aren't any fluffier than an optimized competitive list, they just have lots of weak choices.
You are making the same mistake. He said makes it with a theme which doesn't mean purposefully poor. Just means theme choices is a main concern over just because its better choices. His way is not exclusive either.
6,000pts (over 5,000 painted to various degrees, rest are still on the sprues)