Reserve question

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**rigeld2**

Zodiark wrote:
azreal13 wrote:
No, if a shop makes a rule that contradicts a rule in the BRB, but applies it consistently, then it's a house rule, and part of wargaming.

Sometimes "understanding" is simply a level of ignorance where "some people" have no idea how little they know.

Reading comprehension is something that should be focused on more in schools, we'd have less people with questions with obvious answers and less pointless bickering.

Also, nos you say it is fine, I call it cheating. When a rule is in question, interpret as you will, intentionally changing the RAW is breaking the rules. I am a very by the book player and changing the rules is not by the book. Though I am partial to rolling on a die for it.

Automatically Appended Next Post:

rigeld2 wrote:
Self censored.

Can't we all just get along. We are talking about a friggin board game here people.

Wow. WOW. I removed something that was borderline rude to be polite (without being asked to) and you not only call me out on it but insult others in the very same post?

Class act man. Well done.