Switch Theme:

Basic vs. Advanced and allying  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair






 Lobukia wrote:
 Kommissar Kel wrote:
Well you don't have any FE units at that point.
You just have TE units.
You do not gain any of the FE rules without the units being in an FE detachment.
.


Not challenging, genuinely curious. Where are you getting this from, and what relevance would the distinction make?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
I'll leave this here.

www.frontlinegaming.org/2014/06/11/writing-a-40k-list-for-7th-ed-40k-and-the-bao-2014/


The FAQ changes all instances of Army to FE Detachment.

So you have to have a FE detachment to gain any of the benefits and you only have to follow the restrictions in a FE detachment. If the detachment is not a FE detachment(instead a TE detachment) then you lose everything that would make the units FE units, instead they are just Tau units(which would default to TE units).

The sample list on the site you linked follows these distinctions(in so much as we can see as upgrades are not listed and I do not know what restrictions are placed in the CS supplement).

This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.



 
   
Made in us
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard






Peoria IL

Wait. What? So, your saying that FE crisis suits wouldn't be troops and wouldn't have the options in their book if I put them in the same CAD as a TE buffmander? I heartily disagree. This would be the exact opposite of what a faction is. Factions put them all in one CAD (except MT and SM) and have them follow their own books, but able to be in a CAD with other units from other sources in their faction.

DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0

QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners 
   
Made in us
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair






 Lobukia wrote:
Wait. What? So, your saying that FE crisis suits wouldn't be troops and wouldn't have the options in their book if I put them in the same CAD as a TE buffmander? I heartily disagree. This would be the exact opposite of what a faction is. Factions put them all in one CAD (except MT and SM) and have them follow their own books, but able to be in a CAD with other units from other sources in their faction.


Lets look at the rule then:
"Battlesuit Spearhead: In a Farsight Enclaves Detachment, all XV8 Crisis teams are troops choices instead of Elites choices."

So yeah, the rules are incredibly clear on this, if it is not a Farsight Enclaves detachment, Crisis teams are not troops.

This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.



 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




Vanished Completely

Kel,
Agreed...
In order to gain access to these Rules the Unit has to belong to the correct Detachment.

Questions related to how the Rules define those Detachments and if same Faction Units which do not violate these Detachment Restrictions are allowed....

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/06/16 14:08:08


8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures.  
   
Made in au
Tea-Kettle of Blood




Adelaide, South Australia

Is there anything stopping you from putting Tau Empire units in a Farsight Enclaves detachment?

 Ailaros wrote:
You know what really bugs me? When my opponent, before they show up at the FLGS smears themselves in peanut butter and then makes blood sacrifices to Ashterai by slitting the throat of three male chickens and then smears the spatter pattern into the peanut butter to engrave sacred symbols into their chest and upper arms.
I have a peanut allergy. It's really inconsiderate.

"Long ago in a distant land, I, M'kar, the shape-shifting Master of Chaos, unleashed an unspeakable evil! But a foolish Grey Knight warrior wielding a magic sword stepped forth to oppose me. Before the final blow was struck, I tore open a portal in space and flung him into the Warp, where my evil is law! Now the fool seeks to return to real-space, and undo the evil that is Chaos!" 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




Vanished Completely

Nothing stopping us from doing so, aside from the lack of instructions telling us how to determine if it is a Farsight Enclave or Tau Empire Detachment but if you get around that there is nothing preventing a "Mixed Detachment." The Rule is that a Detachment can contain any number of Units belonging to the same Faction, and that Supplements and mother Codex's are the same Faction, so there is nothing preventing you from mixing Units from the two books together in a single Detachment. There is no real benefit from doing so at this point in time, as the Rules which give the Supplement Units their special ability trigger based on which Detachment they are in and not which book they where originally purchased for.

For example, a Tau Empire Crisis Suit put into a Farsight Enclave Detachment is still bound by the Farsight Enclave requirements for Crisis Suits and gains the benefits as well.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/06/17 09:46:37


8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures.  
   
Made in us
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair






 PrinceRaven wrote:
Is there anything stopping you from putting Tau Empire units in a Farsight Enclaves detachment?


Yes; the global rules from FE; they state that all units that cantake bonding, must; and then that all units have Ork hunters, and that all Crisis teams are troops, and the signature systems effect all characters within the detachment.

Basically the rules that make your TE units FE units are tied to all units bought within a FE detachment. And an FE detachment absolutely cannot contain Shadowsun or aun'Va.

This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.



 
   
Made in se
Executing Exarch






 Kommissar Kel wrote:
 Lobukia wrote:
Wait. What? So, your saying that FE crisis suits wouldn't be troops and wouldn't have the options in their book if I put them in the same CAD as a TE buffmander? I heartily disagree. This would be the exact opposite of what a faction is. Factions put them all in one CAD (except MT and SM) and have them follow their own books, but able to be in a CAD with other units from other sources in their faction.


Lets look at the rule then:
"Battlesuit Spearhead: In a Farsight Enclaves Detachment, all XV8 Crisis teams are troops choices instead of Elites choices."

So yeah, the rules are incredibly clear on this, if it is not a Farsight Enclaves detachment, Crisis teams are not troops.


What is the definition of a "Farsight Enclaves Detachment" then?
   
Made in us
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair






Either it is self defined as a detachment you are drawing from the supplement book, Or you can never use the rules within the supplement books.

Your choice.

This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.



 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




Vanished Completely

Agreed with Kel on that,
As there are no official definitions to guide us we are left to our own devices, with the best answer simply being 'define it during creation.'

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2014/06/17 15:38:40


8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures.  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: