Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

For me, they haven't been writing GOOD codex so much as writing less godawful ones.

The supplements for some reason seem to be better. Probably so that you buy the codex, roll your eyes, read the supplement and buy that to use instead.

7th as a system is OK, though i'm not overfond of the shonky WHFB magic system they grafted on.

TBH i kindof stopped caring that deeply about 40K some time back. I still play, but not as often as i used to.

Maybe the DE release will draw me back in. I had hoped for the Ork codex to do so, but it didn't really cater to my tastes much. The ghazzy supplement did better in this regard, so i'm still playing..

A haemonculus supplement with all sorts of Coven goodies might dig me out of my lethargy, perhaps...

Echoing the above: balance looks better but they've taken a bad turn in other areas as mentioned. Gorramit GW how hard is it.

 gwarsh41 wrote:

I think we have to wait and see what happens to necrons and DE. Blood angels... eh, Marines havent been top dogs since 5th edition rhino rush died.

Just Blood Angels? Or Marines in general? Because Codex: Space Marines have a good amount of obnoxious stuff IMO.