bob82ca wrote:Yes but dude I never claimed that my way is the right way! So cool your gak. My point was that they actually publish the rules in books that people buy! I understand the point you are trying to make ......I ...get ...it.
It's just an open discussion and that was my example. Do you think that the game is balanced the way it is? Serious question no troll. And if not, what restrictions would you make to balance the game?
Yeah I agree your rules can be better and modified after been tried a few times. In fact a lot better. Do I think
40K is balanced? No. One of the reasons why I quit playing. The other reason is nobody plays anymore. Why nobody plays anymore? Probably because
40K is not balanced and costs to much to keep playing with edition changes.
First thing I would do to make
40K more balanced is cost effectiveness. Have EVERYTHING costed properly, not just be buy guess work. For example there is no way back in 5th edition 2 Spore Mines should cost the same against a Space Marine. Even now there is no reason why a Genestealer should cost about the same as a Space Marine.
So if
GW wants to have over powered units, fine. But first make sure they are costed appropriately first.
Second make clear concise rules. Let there be no chance for arguing, or debating and not use the "let's roll for it, so we can keep playing". Another reason the game is unbalanced is people interpret the rules differently.
Third. If you are going to have edition changes, then make sure every army is updated at the same time. This way we don't have the Eldar and Tyranids have to pay for fleet in 4th then
GW lets everyone have it for free and rules changes yet the Eldar and Tyranids have to still pay for it.
