Switch Theme:

KFF cover units embarked on transport  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Flashy Flashgitz





Are you also implying that flamer overwatch is not a shooting attack because the way its hits are resolved is different from its normal profile?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/10 09:57:09


Warboss Troil
"Less chat, more splat!" 
   
Made in us
Krazed Killa Kan




Homestead, FL

Soul blaze is a result of an attack, the unit took a wound and demonic goodies are inside the unit now and want to eat the sweet sweet souls of anything nearby.

The flamer one is implying that the flame itself gets in to the open topped vehicle and hits people inside, So its a SHOOTING attack that gets a special rule against passengers inside. it most definitely is a shooting attack and units inside would benefit from a KFF. Hell if flamers didn't have Ignores cover I would say they benefit from a cover safe from the vehicle as well :-P. I have not had this situation come up in my games but I bet you my club would allow the save based on common sense alone.

I come in peace. I didn't bring artillery. But I'm pleading with you, with tears in my eyes: If you mess with me, I'll kill you all

Marine General James Mattis, to Iraqi tribal leaders 
   
Made in gb
Confessor Of Sins





Newton Aycliffe

 koooaei wrote:
 FlingitNow wrote:
Flamers aren't shooting attacks? No Escape is certainly part of a shooting attack. You get the save as all models count as being in the same area as the hull RaW.


Pretty sure it's not a shooting attack. Can you prove otherwise with quotes?

 koooaei wrote:
Soulblaze is a result of a shooting attack but is not a shooting attack itself, is it? So, here's an example of something being a result of a shooting attack while not being a shooting attack itself.


While trying not to go too deep in the Shooting Attack debate:

All attacks in the game are technically only Shooting Attacks or Close Combat attacks. Special Rules dealing damage are usually considered shooting attacks, with 1 or 2 very borderline cases.

DA:80-S+G+M+B++I-Pw40k01++D+++A+++WD100R++T(T)DM+
Roronoa Zoro wrote:When the world shoves you around, you just gotta stand up and shove back. It's not like somebody's gonna save you if you start babbling excuses. - Bring on the hardship. It's preferred in a path of carnage.
Manchu wrote:
It's like you take a Space Marine and say "what could make him cooler?" Instead of adding more super-genetic-psycho-organic modification, you take it all away. You have a regular human left in power armor and all the armies of hell at the gates. And she doesn't even flinch. Pure. Badass. 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: