Swastakowey wrote:
I think I saw a movie that felt similar to
40k called mutant Chronicles. Movie kinda sucked but the setting and grimness was very
40k. It was then that it hit me, grim movies like that usually tank in ratings (as in suck) so putting up with using someones elses idea for a movie that will likely be forgotten is a bad idea.
As a long-time fan of the Mutant Chronicles universe, the movie - while playing at the heartstrings of fans - was terrible.
D&D made a few attempts... each of them terrible.
The real bottom-line has been and always will be $. Despite how 'successful'
GW is, if they investing the kind of $ that would be required to make a decent attempt at a full-length live-action film, it would be a fairly enormous risk for them, with -zero- assurance that it would even break-even. For each 'Game of Thrones' or 'Lord of the Rings' that you have being huge successes based off of fantasy/sci-fi IPs, you have tons of 'Dungeon Siege', 'Mutant Chronicles', 'Lone Ranger', 'Dungeons and Dragons' etc, flops that prove just how wrong things can go.
All it would take, then, is for a production house to see the IP and think it was worth a look - but looking at
40K 'seriously', folks outside the hobby likely raised a brow and think, 'Uhh.... okaaaay...'
But who knows? It took Comic Books a long time to get where they are in cinema right now... who knows what might come for
GW down the road?