Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Jihadin wrote:
I think we're more incline/familiar/experienced/lived by/die by/ingrained to Short Term to Long Term Goals there Jake. Quite a few do not think of that off the bat

Sure, people are. But good CEOs can't afford such an outlook.

Business school has taught me that you always have to consider the long term.

 Frazzled wrote:
Except of course, she is now polling lower than the primary Republican candidates, and Bernie Sanders - the freaking avowed socialist- is pulling more small contributions then she is-indicating real support.

She's having trouble beating a socialist in her own primary.

And it's one poll, and its July 2015. All you need to know to realize that polling a year out isn't that simple is to look at all the polls where Donald Trump is leading, and recognizing that neither Trump or Sanders will never win a presidential nomination.

Clinton's sitting in a field where she's on the face of it, the only one who can win, and things change radically once you have the nomination.

 Frazzled wrote:

 Co'tor Shas wrote:
I have to wonder what does being a successful business person have to do with running the country? The government is not a business, and should not be run as one.

They are successful at running something? They are successful at managing large groups of people.
The President is the Chief Executive. Although they seem to have forgotten for generations, but their job is to efficiently run the government and implement congressional action.

That makes sense. Although I'd prefer someone who ran a successful state (like Pataki!).

Trump did his bankruptcy(s) as a strategic move right?

 Jihadin wrote:
Trump did his bankruptcy(s) as a strategic move right?

Well, Trump is a text book case of how to be a good businessman by being a bad businessman. Granted, I guess that's it's own kind of success and he's still richer than me

I want to see what type of Shenanigans he would pull if the US would default on a debt payment..............

At this point it's time to lock it up and ask you to post in the political thread. Cheers