Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I say go with the first one. It's a nice middle ground between the "action" and "yearbook" poses. The conversion looks good either way. Why did you say Farsight looks short and stubby though? I don't own the official model (converted my own) but I was under the impression from online pics that he is the same size as the old finecast enforcer.

I like option 1 the best, but they all work.

The finecast version is about one head taller than a normal crisis suit, the commander is taller and much bulkier. Here's a side by side, I placed them so they are at the same foot level.

Wow, yeah, that is a big difference that I wasn't aware of! Do you happen to have the normal finecast commander? I found this pic over on ATT (in a thread ironically you posted in years ago) comparing the two. I can't tell for sure but it may be that the plastic version is even bigger than the finecast version as well.



http://advancedtautactica.com/viewtopic.php?p=266818&sid=d90c6d0a15cd433b7c0bdd112973f7b9