Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Kilkrazy wrote:
It is like is the traditional way of dividing up a cake when you are children. I cut the cake in two and you choose which slice you will have. This ensures I will make the division as fair as possible.

AoS is a bit more like dividing a packet of biscuits. I take one, you take one, I take one, you take one, I take one, you decide you have got enough and I take another three.

Or five, or ten.

Okay, thank you guys so much for the fantastic answers. I think when I run both, I will just run one as a generic hero with the enchanted shield as a "white lion's pelt", after reading the buff to what Korhil gives to nearby White Lions, I can see why people could be upset. It is essentially the same benefit as the command ability of the Prince, but with lower range and it is a static ability.

I can see both sides of the question, and I feel that it is something that I would make sure to talk to my opponent about. Since we are using Azyr Comp, it won't be very often that iI would run both, I just thought it would fit the very Chrace heavy theme for the infantry models.