Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Sigvatr wrote:

Experiment 626 wrote:

It may suck royally that the current system is set-up against the victim in this type of case,

Eh....what?! Innocent until proven guilty is "set-up against the victim"? So in your opinion, in such a case, it should be up to the accused to prove that he's innocent?

I think you might want to read entire posts before responding, because the rest of the post was essentially "this sucks, but due process still applies".

Using devil's advocate doesn't prove a point, it's used to weaken a point. You cannot prove a (false) statement by saying "Meh, the other side is not better anyway.". the statement remains false in that case. The system is not set-up against anyone as it's the same for everyone. Either elaborate on how it's set-up or let the statement vanish into the nothingness of falsehood.