Switch Theme:

Would you allow non SM loyalist dreads like walkers to have the Roused to war rule ?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets






No, because they're not SM Dreads. If they FAQ it to say Helbrutes and Kans get the +2 attacks, then fine.

~1.5k
Successful Trades: Ashrog (1), Iron35 (1), Rathryan (3), Leth (1), Eshm (1), Zeke48 (1), Gorkamorka12345 (1),
Melevolence (2), Ascalam (1), Swanny318, (1) ScootyPuffJunior, (1) LValx (1), Jim Solo (1), xSoulgrinderx (1), Reese (1), Pretre (1) 
   
Made in gb
Ancient Chaos Terminator






Surfing the Tervigon Wave...on a baby.

 Runic wrote:
I replied to tneva82.

They've done the described things in the draft. And I said we'll see about the final version.


I don't hold hopes for the final versions.

Considering they've already gutted GSCs down to AoC level (making their whole infiltrating formation schtick practically unusable) and have also decided that drop pod footprints need to be even more ridiculous in what they can affect....

I hold no hopes for final versions.



Now only a CSM player. 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: