Switch Theme:

Rulings on Formations?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




How so? The 'cites don't belong to a detachment, meaning it is not battle forged.
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

 Lance845 wrote:
The Tyrannocytes would not be part of the detachment, but you can make a battleforged army with a single formation and as many Tyrannocytes as you could afford.

From 'Battle-forged Armies' (pg. 117, main rulebook):

A player using the Battle-forged method must organize all the units they want to use into Detachments...

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/10/12 17:14:36


'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





 Massaen wrote:
You might read it as a restriction but when the sheet literally has a box that is labelled restriction you can surely see the issue.

Also - read cypher - he has an exception saying he can be part of ANY detachment...


The only permissions you have from the formation to take are the units listed, and anything extra (say, dedicated transports) normally available to the units listed in the formation. That's a restriction right there.
   
Made in us
Auspicious Daemonic Herald





 Lance845 wrote:
The Tyrannocytes would not be part of the detachment, but you can make a battleforged army with a single formation and as many Tyrannocytes as you could afford.
every model has to be in a detachment to be a battle forged
   
Made in ca
Foolproof Falcon Pilot




Ontario, Canada

 Lance845 wrote:
The Tyrannocytes would not be part of the detachment, but you can make a battleforged army with a single formation and as many Tyrannocytes as you could afford.

How? Being slotless doesn't mean they don't have to be in a detachment. It just gives you permission to take any number of them in an existing detachment. Am I missing a rule somewhere that gives tyrannocytes permission to break the rule saying every unit in a battle-forged army must belong to a detachment?
EDIT: Dangit, apparently my phone was really slow updating the thread. Ninja'd by approximately the entire internet.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2016/10/12 20:23:25


 
   
Made in au
Infiltrating Broodlord





Okay for a more fun aspect to think about.

newer detachments are now just multiple formations

the main guys to get effected by this is Cypher and some AM units

So unless you are taking a CAD or Allied Detachment you cannot take them?
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





No, other detachments that aren't just A formation. I would say that even a Decurion as a detachment made of different formations, you could take Cypher, just not as one of the formations itself making up the Decurion unless it had provisions for taking him.

Or you can go unbound.
   
Made in us
Not as Good as a Minion





Astonished of Heck

GodDamUser wrote:
Okay for a more fun aspect to think about.

newer detachments are now just multiple formations

the main guys to get effected by this is Cypher and some AM units

So unless you are taking a CAD or Allied Detachment you cannot take them?

Not entirely true. There is usually a Choice which is NOT a Formation.

Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right.
 
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

However, looking at the Decurion and the various Strike Forces in Angels of Death they all have the following listed as a part of the restrictions:

Only the datasheets listed here can be included in this Detachment.

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in au
Screaming Shining Spear





Western Australia

Codex trumps BRB right? The unit entries (like cypher) say he can be part of ANY detachment... formations are detachments. He doesn't take up a slot so that's not an issue either.

Don't get me wrong - I agree he should not be able to join formations but given we have a specific exception saying ANY detachment (with a few caveats) I don't see how you cant allow him.

For gaming, hobby and events in Perth, Western Australia - https://objectivesecured.com.au 
   
Made in us
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair






Ghaz posted a rule from a Codex.

And that rule from that codex(well nearly all the new codices)is more specific.

It is a Specific rule that applies only to that specific detachment, just like the Cadian Battlegroup limits special characters; it can also only contain the listed datasheets(so no adding commissars to the special FOC when that is exactly what would be allowed by the slotless rules(since the battlegroup does have an FOC as specifically stated in the how to make an army section that allows the Battlegroup).

This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.



 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





I agree with Kommissar Kel - it's a rule that's even more advanced/specific that's preventing other models/units not listed for the Decurion to be put in them. If a Decurion did not have that rule, though, you could put in a Decurion (which allows different choices) something that doesn't take up slots as part of the Decurion. The question I'd have now is whether there are any Decurions that don't have that boilerplate statement about including only datasheets listed there.
   
Made in us
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair






I had actually missed the part Ghaz quoted in the discussion a year ago; I cited the section that tells us the Decurion-style detachments have a special FOC, and as having an FOC allows for the slotless rules. But that other rule that only those datasheets specified are allowed negates the slotless rules from the brb; those datasheets are what allow you to take those units.

This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.



 
   
Made in ro
Longtime Dakkanaut



Moscow, Russia

So if you take the Endless Swarm formation, you could put each of the initial units in a Tyrannocite, but when and if they return, they would enter the game normally?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
EDIT: never mind

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/10/22 00:53:25


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: