Switch Theme:

UPDATED IMAGE - Looking for some criticism---honesty is valued!  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM





 John Prins wrote:
 Bottle wrote:
The artificer brush is a good investment. I have used one for over a year and it is still going strong and I use it for all my highlights.



Counterpoint: I have inexpensive art store brushes that I've had and used for 20 years.

I'm not saying that GW isn't selling good product, but they're not selling good value for the money. You can spend 1/3 the money and get as good or better hobby tools elsewhere.


I wouldn't really say it's a counterpoint. If you have found good brushes elsewhere it doesn't stop the artificer brush from being a good brush too (regardless to if you think it's worth the price or not). If you have one, it's a great brush for highlights, the OP has one. My comment was to point that if the OP has already bought an artificer he doesn't need to shop around to find a highlighting brush elsewhere because he already has an excellent tool for the job.

Bye bye Dakkadakka, happy hobbying! I really enjoyed my time on here. Opinions were always my own :-) 
   
 
Forum Index » Painting & Modeling
Go to: