Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

If that is the case ( I dont have the rulebook with me ) then were screwed. Just choose then, re roll both dice with " er we go ", or spend a bloody command point and re roll 1. Case closed.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

nekooni wrote:

Where does it say that?

Under the ability in the codex entry for " er we go "

Whew, this getting tiresome.

EWG has no clauses whatsoever.

 Crusaderobr wrote:
Under the ability in the codex entry for " er we go "

a) there's no codex
b) I only have the 4 imperial Indexes, what does the rule actually say? I find it hard to believe that GW actually wrote "You may re-roll the original Charge roll" instead of "You may re-roll Charge rolls" or "You may re-roll failed Charge rolls", to be frank.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 SlaveToDorkness wrote:
Whew, this getting tiresome.

EWG has no clauses whatsoever.

Thanks for confirming that, I was just curious why they would be so overly specific in that one instance.

Index Xenos II pg 10: A unit with this ability may reroll failed charge rolls.

Ere we go was worded exactly the same in 7th and GW faq'd that back then to mean 1 or both. Why would it be any different just because of an edition change.

mhalko1 wrote:
Ere we go was worded exactly the same in 7th and GW faq'd that back then to mean 1 or both. Why would it be any different just because of an edition change.

Because it's an entirely new ruleset. It's not an update to 7th. And we already have an FAQ, does it change anything?

mhalko1 wrote:
Ere we go was worded exactly the same in 7th and GW faq'd that back then to mean 1 or both. Why would it be any different just because of an edition change.

Is the wording in the core rules for charge moves exactly the same?

Drager wrote:
So would you say the equivalent rule in the Power From Pain tree, Eager to Flay on Xenos 1 P 42 would let you reroll one or both, but Ere We Go would not?

That's an absolute cracker of a question.

Reading it I would lean towards allowing you to roll either or both dice. The reason being that Ere We Go only allows you to reroll failed charges, whereas Eager to Flay has no qualifier at all to activate the rule. It also directly references the dice, which HWG doesn't, and you get to reroll dice even if the charge made it into contact in the first place.

Cheers

Andrew