Appropriate army size to have a LoW?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Vector Strike**

Hanskrampf wrote:
I think the HH restriction of 25% of total points can go into superheavies is still a valid orientation.

It's a good rule of thumb.
However, the coolest LoWs cost so much now that people might never field them (Ta'unar only at 6k games

)

**BaconCatBug**

Rules say any size. Thus the appropriate army size is "any".