WFB 6th Edition vs. Kings of War

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Just Tony**

TinyLegions wrote:
Hi Guys:

As the purveyor of www.classichammer.com I am ever supportive of someone getting their feet wet in a more classic game of Warhammer. With that in mind it would be the 6th for me.

Wading into the step-up argument, probably foolishly, I have seen it happen where my Dwarf army gets owned on the front by a lucky roll of dice, and have someone have their dice totally crap out on them. There are other rules from WAB that I would prefer to use before I would use step-up.

Having said that, if you do use step-up, I would reduce the lethality of it for the 6th. Making it so that you can attack without any buffs from your weapons seems more reasonable to me.

PS. First post on here

Welcome to the forum! Also feel free to scan the Legacy section as there are a ton of threads involving 6th, including KGT17's journey through building a 1,000 point force for damn near every WFB army in 6th.

**TinyLegions**

I certainly will JT.

**brr-icy**

Personally it doesn't change enough to be game breaking, since you don't get your charge bonuses, the charger still has a huge advantage. but it does reduce the dance