Switch Theme:

8th edition's core rules do not cause excessive lethality  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer




The dark hollows of Kentucky

 vict0988 wrote:
Not Online!!! wrote:
 A Town Called Malus wrote:
Not Online!!! wrote:
it's high time that subfaction traits get a pricepoint imo.


They should have had them from the start.


Thank you, infact some prottype traits in 7th allready had that.... it's as if GW is learn resistent.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Gadzilla666 wrote:
Not Online!!! wrote:
it's high time that subfaction traits get a pricepoint imo.

In points or cp?

I'd say points as it allows much more space for balance. Theirs a lot more points in a match to work with.

in pts of course.

Or is it really much of a competition between an WB CSM and an AL csm?

The imbalance could have been made up by better Stratagems, WL traits and Relics. AL should have gotten little to nothing in terms of upgrades, just enough to be on-par or slightly better than the Renegade Chapters and WB needed to have gotten what they got or maybe even better. The fact they produced CSM v.1.9 without an upgraded WB Trait was shameful.

The fact they produced 1.0 with that level of disparity was the original sin.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: