Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Wayniac wrote:
Why are you arguing semantics for stuff that doesn't really matter? Like seriously dude.

Who decides it doesn't matter? You? Me? The rules exist as a framework. I am of the opinion that you cannot remain logically consistent if you ignore some rules and not others (i.e. If you ignore one rule you can ignore them all). The only objective standard is to follow what the rules actually say. A lot of people used to say it doesn't matter that some models could end up with no CCW and thus unable to attack, but GW still fixed it. A lot of people used to say it doesn't matter that the original BRB missions allowed you to deploy models outside of your deployment zone so long as one model of the unit was inside it, but GW fixed it anyway. A lot of people used to say it doesn't matter that you were forced to use Single Use weapons the first time you fired, but GW fixed it anyway.

Good for GW.