Switch Theme:

Why Grey Knight's Nemesis Force Spears are called Halberds?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Rampaging Reaver Titan Princeps




Moriarty wrote:
I blame Gygaxs’ pole arm fetish from D&D. Keeps leaking out all over the place.

I was thinking the exact same thing. Specifically Appendix T (yes, I did have to look that up) from Unearthed Arcana. 6 pages (with drawings) about proper nomenclature of pole arms, with a rambling preamble about maces, morning stars and Authors Who Should Know Better.

Based on his drawings, E.G.G. would have said the Grey Knight picture is holding either a Voulge, a Glaive or a Glaive-Guisarme, likely the latter due to the spike on the back. Several days later he would have finished explaining why the Swiss variant is undoubtedly superior.

Efficiency is the highest virtue. 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: