NAVARRO wrote:
Ketara wrote:
The only way to circumvent this right now is to try and develop an
AI that can generate 3D files out of 2D images. Which isn't impossible, some minor progress has been made in that direction already, and that's probably what the ads are drawing upon. But.....don't expect detailed printable models out of that. 3D space is much more complex than 2D. Those programs are aimed at creating animated videos, not stuff you can physically make and hold.
.
Thanks for your post I agree with many of your points but I would like to single out this one since theres been recent developments from Adobe Integrating
AI and 2D conversion into 3D, the results so far are quite impressive.
Thing is these massive companies dominate the industry and they are really pushing this as fast as they can, just to get even more share of the market.
To be honest, I'd be more inclined to call these efforts 2 1/2D. The money/reason this is being pushed is to create movie content - that is to say, something that appears 3d when viewed on a flat 2d screen. So the software attempts to register and generate ways of creating the illusion of depth. In the same way your average artist when drawing a square learns to draw lines backwards at an angle to depict a 3D cube. It's a form of generating a predictive optical illusion more than it is a true 3D model.
For the movie makers/animated studios, that's good enough. Perfect 2 1/2D works for them, because nobody can ever look around at the '3D' bunny on the screen from a different angle. But to turn that concept into a proper 3D model, with appropriate varying depth for each detail - and then adding texturing on top? I just don't see one of these programs being capable of that - it's fundamentally different to what they do and how they work. And even if they could, there simply isn't the money involved for anyone to even bother trying to push it to that final step - Warner Brothers don't care about printing tabletop miniatures!