Tyel wrote:I find the idea that you could recruit gangsters from the 1930s - or indeed today - and they'd somehow represent crack regiments in WW2 or today a bit silly.
In terms of average ability, its basically an issue of training - both time and budget.
I assume that the
IG uses some version of the ASVAB - the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Every potential inductee into the US military takes this test to determine what they know, and what they might learn. Some career fields have low requirements, while others are quite high.
Depending on the gang, it might only be suitable for meat shields, but those with a tech or mechanical focus, would be routed into those career fields.
Let us pause and recall that logistics decide the outcome of wars. For every trigger-puller at the front, there are lots of people fabricating the weapons, the ammunition, and seeing those supplies get where they need to be.
Thus: scrounger types might have very useful skills that would keep them away from the front lines and lead to productive careers.
We tend to think of the PBI as taking most of the hits, but for a while, the career field in Iraq that took the must casualties was truck drivers due to the IEDs. Food for thought.
I can see hive gangs coming to "arrangements" with judges about how a certain number of accessions would be arranged in exchange for looking the other way on certain matters. That way the planet meets its quota without using too much conscription, and the most volatile of the gangers are sent offworld for someone else to deal with.