Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I'm betting they botch 11th with 40k so I'm going to mostly exit that system and just stick to Old World. Game is almost 2.25 years old and we've had 1 major change to it. I'll take that stability over the other main core games.

 nathan2004 wrote:
I'm betting they botch 11th with 40k so I'm going to mostly exit that system and just stick to Old World. Game is almost 2.25 years old and we've had 1 major change to it. I'll take that stability over the other main core games.

Assuming it's a .5 iteration there isn't much to both for 11th. The game is currently fairly balanced at a macro level, the core rules generally work in a sensible way, most armies have somethonf they can do to be relevant.

If current army rules remain compatible then the biggest thing I can see them altering is mission formats and terrain. In both cases I cant see it being if any worse than it is now.