Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

If you have multiple units in a combat do you add up all the ranks from all the units you have to see if you're steadfast, or do you just use the unit with the most ranks?

Thanks.

Kasrkinlegion wrote:If you have multiple units in a combat do you add up all the ranks from all the units you have to see if you're steadfast, or do you just use the unit with the most ranks?

Thanks.

Unit with the most ranks.

There is a rule saying somewhere that you can only take the highest number of ranks in a single combat when determining things like that.

Wow that sucks. Kind of stupid if you have four units on the enemy, but he has more ranks than any one of yours. They really shouldn't have gotten rid of outnumbering.

Kasrkinlegion wrote:Wow that sucks. Kind of stupid if you have four units on the enemy, but he has more ranks than any one of yours. They really shouldn't have gotten rid of outnumbering.

They really shouldn't have done much of what they did. This'll really make you wonder: 10 Goblins can break ranks, but 5 Chaos Knights can't. I know which one I'm more afraid of...

They did it so infantry actually had a use in the game, as opposed to being a poor choice in almost all situations.

Given the game is supposed to simulate to some extent fantastical battles, having it be dominated by cavalry and monsters isnt good for the future of the game.