I have been playing Imperial Guard since before the new codex, but was lucky enough to only have to endure the old one for about 4 months or so until the latest edition came out. Soon afterwards I concocted an all-comers Guard list that began to dominate my local tournament scene. For 6 months I took 1st place five times and 2nd once in our monthly tournament. On the seventh month I took 3rd after losing the final round to a good friend of mine and have since stopped playing in the tournaments. I stopped because I seriously began to notice a lot of condemnation about my Imperial Guard army. Many of the people at my
FLGS have branded me as the "Leafblower" Guard player and it seriously frustrates me, instead of "Hey, great game man, you played well" I get "Hey man, I am not surprised I lost against another Leafblower." My list does have some of the same characteristics of Darkwynn's list, but with some major differences. To give you guys a bit of a brief example, I will throw up my 2000 point list:
CCS w/ 4 plasma + Astro+
OotF in Chimera
x2 Infantry platoons with autocannons in the Infantry squads and x4 Flamers in both
PCS with the
PCS squads in Chimeras
Two Vendettas
Executioner
Eradicator w/ plasma sponsons
Leman Russ
x2 Melta vet squads with one heavy flamer which ride in Dettas
x2 Penal Legion squads
PBS in Chimera
To compare, Darkwynn's list can be viewed here:
http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/09/40k-ard-boys-armylist-leafblower.html
I have been running this list since well before the "Leafblower" ever existed and have been very proud of it. Unfortunately, I get the feeling that any Mech Guard player who ever has success will always be branded as running a Leafblower list. Have any other Mech Guard players out there run into this problem? Is it really fair to use this brand in the first place? Is this list a Leafblower?!?