Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Whats your thoughts and why? Should they be allowed? I think some should be, but there are always certain few that shouldn't be allowed in.

I dont like them simply because certain armies have really powerfull characters and other armies characters suck cack...

Lords are generally decently balanced for point cost and what not...

Lots of tournies i play in dont allow them at all, some do but they are normally the really big ones...

Well, I'm planning a Throgg list to take trolls as core now, so if an event doesn't allow named characters, I won't be playing in it with this army :-/

Any character that changes your armies makeup should be allowed. As long as noticeable effort has been made to theme the rest of the force I believe.

Lexx wrote:Any character that changes your armies makeup should be allowed. As long as noticeable effort has been made to theme the rest of the force I believe.

This i can agree with, as most of those characters arent just omg overpowered..