Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 15:47:24
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
Is it a limit on the effectiveness of tanks? BS 4 is fine, but I'm sure certain tanks would have really good targeting systems that would allow them to hit on BS 5.
I could imagine that's it's simply a way to keep tanks from being overpowered, but is there a real reason?
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 15:50:17
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
On a boat, Trying not to die.
|
Do yo really want, say, vindicators to hit and wound on 2's? Really? Most ways to get a BS 5 on a tank is via upgrade character.
|
Every Normal Man Must Be Tempted At Times To Spit On His Hands, Hoist That Black Flag, And Begin Slitting Throats. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 15:51:37
Subject: Re:Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Because like hell am I going up against a Leman Russ division that scatters 2d6-5.
And I very much doubt my opponents want my Hammerheads hitting on 2s.
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 15:56:20
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
So yeah, it's a limit put in place? Or is it a natural representation of the usual tendency for vehicles to miss-fire....
Honestly, railguns almost seem worthy of BS 5.Such a freakin massively powerful weapon deserves to hit on a 2+.
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 16:14:18
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout
|
I think its normally because the tanks are crewed by the equivalent to normal troops really. You wouldn't waste a Space Marine Captain firing tank guns when he could be out kicking ass on the front line.
|
Emperor's Faithful wrote
- I would rather the Blood Angels have gone down the darker path of the Flesh Tearers than this new "Awesome Codex McBatnipples". *blegh*
6 Marine Armies and counting... Why do I do it to myself ? Someone help me I'm an addict |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 16:18:18
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
It's balance.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 16:44:35
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
Isn't there some space marine character that does give his tank BS 5..............
|
Don "MONDO"
www.ironfistleague.com
Northern VA/Southern MD |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 17:00:52
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Balance is the reason.
You can purchase an upgrade character that will improve your tanks BS. However, it's now a higher priority target and you have fewer points to spend on troops and other vehicles to protect it.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 17:10:15
Subject: Re:Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Sword-Wielding Bloodletter of Khorne
Oklahoma
|
balance and from a fluff stand point. Hitting on a 3 plus is actually extreamly acurate. I normal guardsman can shoot just about as good as a skilled soilder can. Hitting on 3s just doesnt seem all that great but since this is a D6 system thats how it works. If this were a d10 system accurace could be shown much better.
|
Can't you see we have been abandoned? Forget matters of duty and honor to the emperor this is now a matter of pride. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 17:22:15
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair
|
don_mondo wrote:Isn't there some space marine character that does give his tank BS 5..............
Yes; Antaro Chronus. he ignores Shaken, Stunned, and grants BS5
|
This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 17:31:03
Subject: Re:Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant
|
SaintHazard wrote:And I very much doubt my opponents want my Hammerheads hitting on 2s.
Oh but Hammerheads can hit on 2s, just hit the target with a markerlight first
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 17:33:38
Subject: Re:Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
CaptainHonkey wrote:SaintHazard wrote:And I very much doubt my opponents want my Hammerheads hitting on 2s.
Oh but Hammerheads can hit on 2s, just hit the target with a markerlight first
Unless it's an MC or a tank bearing down on my troops, I probably won't waste a markerlight counter on a single shot from a Hammerhead. It'll go to my battlesuits and FW first.
And if the MC or tank isn't bearing down on my troops, it's not in markerlight range anyway.
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 17:44:22
Subject: Re:Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant
|
I know, id rather use it for a Broadside team or Battlesuits.
I was just proving a point
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 17:45:07
Subject: Re:Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
CaptainHonkey wrote:I know, id rather use it for a Broadside team or Battlesuits.
I was just proving a point
Fair enough.
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 22:56:32
Subject: Re:Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
Arkahm
|
SaintHazard wrote:CaptainHonkey wrote:I know, id rather use it for a Broadside team or Battlesuits.
I was just proving a point
Fair enough. 
Or marker light a squad and use the small blast round.... Or am I thinking of a different Tau tank gun?
|
Orkeosaurus wrote:But can he see why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?
xxmatt85 wrote:Brains for the brain god!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 23:06:01
Subject: Re:Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Cambak wrote:SaintHazard wrote:CaptainHonkey wrote:I know, id rather use it for a Broadside team or Battlesuits.
I was just proving a point
Fair enough. 
Or marker light a squad and use the small blast round.... Or am I thinking of a different Tau tank gun?
No, you're correct.
But think of it this way:
12 man FW squad vs Hammerhead railgun subordinance
Target is a 30-Boy Ork mob.
Large blast marker will cover maybe ten hits maximum, less if the player is running his Boyz properly, but let's go with ten. One less inch off of scatter isn't going to change much and it's still going to be fairly chaotic, you still may hit nothing at all.
On the other hand, the difference between firing with the FW squad at BS3 vs BS4...
24 shots.
BS3 = 12 hits
BS4 = 18 hits
12 shots.
BS3 = 6 hits
BS4 = 8 hits
And the FW pulse rifles are more likely to wound.
Personally I'd play the odds and give it to the fire warriors.
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 23:10:00
Subject: Re:Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Deranged Necron Destroyer
|
There's several vehicles with a base BS of 5. They're not very common because generally they would need to be crewed by commanders, where as most are crewed by normal troops. Your basic dudes aren't BS 5 either!
In no particular order, and probably not all of them:
Sammaels Landspeeder
Venerable Dreadnaughts
Bjorn the Fellhanded (BS 6!)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 23:28:19
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
Ah yes. Bjorn. why does he even exist as an actual character? He's 10,000 years old and has only fought once in those long years. The likelyhood of actually using him is near impossible, he shouldn't even have a codex entry. but I digress. Bjorn is still cool as hell  Besides, BS 6 is just for show. You still hit on a 2+.
Venerable dreadnoughts I can understand, since they're the best of the best in dreadnought form. That actually makes sense.
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 23:42:37
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Personally I'm more bothered by the Armour values of tanks being capped at 14, particularly when it comes to superheavies. I'd much rather see some AV 15+ options then be stuck with the Land Raider being the best armoured vehicle in the Galaxy (including Titans and the like).
Jack
|
The rules:
1) Style over Substance.
2) Attitude is Everything.
3) Always take it to the Edge.
4) Break the Rules. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 23:47:19
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
On a boat, Trying not to die.
|
don_mondo wrote:Isn't there some space marine character that does give his tank BS 5..............
Yes, there is. For *whips out his codex* 70 points, you can make any vehicle BS 5 and immune to Crew Shaken and stunned. Put that on your Land Raider and watch you opponents cower in fear!
But seriously, 70 pts for BS5? It seems very extravagant. Probably because he is an Ultramarine. Yeah. I said it.
|
Every Normal Man Must Be Tempted At Times To Spit On His Hands, Hoist That Black Flag, And Begin Slitting Throats. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 23:48:49
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
Jackmojo wrote:Personally I'm more bothered by the Armour values of tanks being capped at 14, particularly when it comes to superheavies. I'd much rather see some AV 15+ options then be stuck with the Land Raider being the best armoured vehicle in the Galaxy (including Titans and the like).
Jack
Well, in apoc, maybe. AV 14+ would be way too much for regular games though. Titans have another damage chart and structure points, warp fields and the like, so their hard enough to kill anyway. Anything above AV 14 would be ridiculously harder to kill. Automatically Appended Next Post: chowderhead13 wrote:don_mondo wrote:Isn't there some space marine character that does give his tank BS 5..............
Yes, there is. For *whips out his codex* 70 points, you can make any vehicle BS 5 and immune to Crew Shaken and stunned. Put that on your Land Raider and watch you opponents cower in fear!
But seriously, 70 pts for BS5? It seems very extravagant. Probably because he is an Ultramarine. Yeah. I said it.
Well, actually, it's a combination of demonic possession and knight commander pask, which both total 70 points separately. I'd say it's pretty well priced, and on a land raider, it's well worth the points.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/07/28 23:50:40
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/28 23:57:33
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Samus_aran115 wrote:Besides, BS 6 is just for show. You still hit on a 2+.
Nope. You hit on a 2+, but if you miss, you get a second shot, and hit on a 6+. That's BS 6.
BS 7 = 2+ 5+
BS 8 = 2+ 4+
BS 9 = 2+ 3+
BS 10 = 2+ 2+
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/29 00:01:30
Subject: Re:Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator
Albuquerque, New Mexico
|
I agree that it is mainly for balance. Also, those are the army's basic troopers in there. However, it seems like some armies should have a vehicle upgrade option for better skill. Eldar come to mind. Call it 'Aspect Upgrade' or something, and now the vehicle is crewed by Dire avengers. It is not right for all armies. I don't really see it for marines though. Sorry to rain on the pipe dreams...
|
40K pronunciation guide. Abaddon = [uh - BAD -done], Belial = [bee - LEEL] (I promise), and chimera = [KY - murr - uh]
DQ:70S++G++M++B+++I--Pw40k95+D+++A++++/eWD210R+T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/29 00:04:40
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
On a boat, Trying not to die.
|
I agree that it is well priced, but here's my problem: HE HAS A SERVO ARM!!! Chronus has a servo arm, can't use it unless he is outside of a tank, is an independent character, and has normal stats! He should be allowed to take servitors. Also, he needs to stop pointing. NOW.
|
Every Normal Man Must Be Tempted At Times To Spit On His Hands, Hoist That Black Flag, And Begin Slitting Throats. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/29 00:06:02
Subject: Why can't vehicles have BS 5?
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
SaintHazard wrote:Samus_aran115 wrote:Besides, BS 6 is just for show. You still hit on a 2+.
Nope. You hit on a 2+, but if you miss, you get a second shot, and hit on a 6+. That's BS 6.
BS 7 = 2+ 5+
BS 8 = 2+ 4+
BS 9 = 2+ 3+
BS 10 = 2+ 2+
Oh, cool, I forgot about this! Omg, I wish something in my army had BS 10.... Automatically Appended Next Post: chowderhead13 wrote:I agree that it is well priced, but here's my problem: HE HAS A SERVO ARM!!! Chronus has a servo arm, can't use it unless he is outside of a tank, is an independent character, and has normal stats! He should be allowed to take servitors. Also, he needs to stop pointing. NOW.
He does? Nice. I don't play vanilla marines, but I always take pask on one of my leman russes (usually the vanilla russ). 70 points for the said effects is basically nothing for a land raider (which rarely gets destroyed anyway).
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/07/29 00:09:17
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
|