| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 19:43:49
Subject: Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes
|
Does kills by Aura of decay/Nurgles rot effect who wins at the end of combat?
I didn't think they did because its a ranged weapon, but scince it effects the people you're in combat with do you get the extra kills at the end of the turn ?
|
Did you know? Every sunday from 12 to 5 pm you can get a carvery for £6.95 at the pudding and pye.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 19:49:02
Subject: Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
|
I believe it does, yes. Or at least thats's how I've always played it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 19:53:18
Subject: Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
DOes it occur in the Assault phase? Fairly certain it does not, so like any other shooting attack no effect on combat res....
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 20:00:39
Subject: Re:Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Nosferatu is correct.
It's a ranged attack that takes place in the shooting phase. The extra bit only states that it can be used while the Prince is in close combat, and his target. However, since it takes place outside of an actual close combat, it does not contribute to the results thereof.
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 20:01:05
Subject: Re:Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Nos is correct. It's a ranged attack that can be used in CC, but the attack still occurs during the shooting phase so it would not count any lost wounds for CC resolution.
Edit:
SaintHazard beat me to the punch!
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/08/11 20:02:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 20:06:31
Subject: Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes
|
That is how i thought it would be, but i can seen a load of men fighting a huge mosters and if there men suddenly start dieing for no reason there not gonna want to fight as much.
|
Did you know? Every sunday from 12 to 5 pm you can get a carvery for £6.95 at the pudding and pye.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 20:10:51
Subject: Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
cheapbuster wrote:That is how i thought it would be, but i can seen a load of men fighting a huge mosters and if there men suddenly start dieing for no reason there not gonna want to fight as much.
I imagine they still have to take a morale check like normal if they lose 25% of their guys.
Actually, that's an interesting question - if models are locked in close combat, and lose 25% of their numbers from a shooting attack that can, via exception, target them while locked in close combat, do they still take a morale check?
I can't remember if the book addresses this, and I got the Daemons FAQ right in front of me, it's not in here. Anyone know?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/08/11 20:11:23
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 20:24:41
Subject: Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Fairly certain you dont take morale checks in CC...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 20:30:40
Subject: Re:Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
You might be right, can you remember the bit in the BGB that says that?
I've got a buddy borrowing mine, or I'd check myself.
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 20:57:43
Subject: Re:Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Long Island, New York, USA
|
BRB page 44, a unit locked in close combat does not have to take a morale check for taking 25% casualties under taking morale checks section 'A' casualties.
|
I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 20:58:56
Subject: Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Page 44, under 'A) Casualties'
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/11 21:13:36
Subject: Re:Aura of decay/Nurgles rot in combat
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Derp.
I knew that, see, just checking to make sure you all were paying attention.
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|