Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/13 05:39:38
Subject: Land Raider Crusader question...
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
In the case of vehicle damage, when a Weapon Destroyed result comes up, if the opponent picks the hurricane bolters, is that side-per-side or the entire system?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/13 05:47:02
Subject: Land Raider Crusader question...
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Charleston, SC
|
Per side.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/13 06:18:04
Subject: Land Raider Crusader question...
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
awesome! that's what we were figuring too... Automatically Appended Next Post: one more... Does the placement of the multi-melta cupola/turret have to be at the top back of the hull? I was figuring to make the lowered section the "weapons deck", with the melta and the assault cannon to be maintained by the techmarine, with the driver manning the top hatch with a better view.
Does this one-inch-forward emplacement count as "modelling to advantage?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/08/13 09:36:02
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/13 09:47:41
Subject: Land Raider Crusader question...
|
 |
Ferocious Black Templar Castellan
|
SoloFalcon1138 wrote:awesome! that's what we were figuring too...
Automatically Appended Next Post:
one more... Does the placement of the multi-melta cupola/turret have to be at the top back of the hull? I was figuring to make the lowered section the "weapons deck", with the melta and the assault cannon to be maintained by the techmarine, with the driver manning the top hatch with a better view.
Does this one-inch-forward emplacement count as "modelling to advantage?
Well, technically it's a weapon hardpoint, so I don't see the problem. Same issue as with sponsons in the front or in the back IMO, just play it any way you want.
|
For thirteen years I had a dog with fur the darkest black. For thirteen years he was my friend, oh how I want him back. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/13 09:52:48
Subject: Land Raider Crusader question...
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
excellent!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/08/13 14:42:12
Subject: Re:Land Raider Crusader question...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Each Hurricane Bolter sponson is an individual weapon. Each is fired as a single weapon. Therefore, even though you pay for the whole system at once, each sponson individually is removed for Weapon Destroyed results.
And it really doesn't matter where you put the pintle-mounted weapon, as long as it's a valid weapon hardpoint. Any of the hatches will do. Just keep in mind that pintle-mounted weapons have 360 degree firing arcs, and if you put it lower on the vehicle, your LOS may be blocked by the vehicle itself. You measure LOS and range from the weapon, so putting it further forward WILL give you a perfectly legal range advantage, but may gimp your LOS a bit. It's entirely your call.
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
|