| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2010/09/15 13:36:33
Subject: Close combat attacks vs vehicle
|
|
Deranged Necron Destroyer
|
I was wondering something... Is normal close combat attack considered to be AP-? Or better to say, does normal close combat attack give -1 penalty on vehicle damage check?
|
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny
(")_(") to help him gain world domination. |
|
|
 |
|
2010/09/15 13:42:03
Subject: Close combat attacks vs vehicle
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
No, close combat attacks have no AP vallue at all.
AP is shooting only.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/09/15 13:42:43
Subject: Re:Close combat attacks vs vehicle
|
|
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
|
I honestly thought this way when I first started playing. However, I was told that they are not the same. Essentially, AP - is a value, and the lack of an AP is not the same as the value of AP -.
|
In regards to landraiders:
Joey wrote:
... that unit of badass assault troops which could all be wiped out by a single ordinance template is instead nuts deep in the enemy bowels and is pumping firey vengeance into their enemy's gunline.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/09/15 13:44:01
Subject: Re:Close combat attacks vs vehicle
|
|
Deranged Necron Destroyer
|
Thx a lot... Just was thinking of it and it had no sense to have AP - ... So I had to ask to be sure 
|
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny
(")_(") to help him gain world domination. |
|
|
|
|
2010/09/15 13:48:20
Subject: Close combat attacks vs vehicle
|
|
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Remember that this applies to ALL Close combat attacks...
Including Meltabombs. 
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
|
|
|
2010/09/15 15:08:36
Subject: Re:Close combat attacks vs vehicle
|
|
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Easiest thing is just remember that the AP mechanic is ignored in every way, shape, and form in CC.
|
 11,100 pts,  7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die. ++
Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/09/15 21:01:57
Subject: Re:Close combat attacks vs vehicle
|
|
Deranged Necron Destroyer
|
Yeah, np... I just didn't know if all had ap- or no ap at all...
Thx for clearing it up guys
|
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny
(")_(") to help him gain world domination. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
