| Poll |
 |
|
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/20 04:17:37
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Stinky Spore
Pittsburgh PA
|
A friend of mine asked me to ask around and see, He just bought a crap ton of space marine bikes on ebay at a steal of a price, i think he got somewhere around 60 models that are a mix of most Bikes and some attack bikes...and So he wants to build an Apoc level White Scars army. I dont remember the days of Chapter Approved, but he insists there were rules in Chapter Approved for White scars that are waaay better than the current Codex Space Marines Kahn List available. He said WS Bikes got an extra attack, more Bikes in a squad, etc etc...But the Question came up...Can you use Chapter Approved Rules Instead of Current Codex Rules? i know for Apoc you may use old models and the rules that go with them..i dunno
would just like someone elses opinion on it, because if you cant use the chapter approved rules, he wants to know so he can "set the army up" the correct way
Kenny
|
If you're ever in Pittsburgh PA, Come play with the Bakery Crew Gaming Club.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/20 04:18:48
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
KenStorm989 wrote:A friend of mine asked me to ask around and see, He just bought a crap ton of space marine bikes on ebay at a steal of a price, i think he got somewhere around 60 models that are a mix of most Bikes and some attack bikes...and So he wants to build an Apoc level White Scars army. I dont remember the days of Chapter Approved, but he insists there were rules in Chapter Approved for White scars that are waaay better than the current Codex Space Marines Kahn List available. He said WS Bikes got an extra attack, more Bikes in a squad, etc etc...But the Question came up...Can you use Chapter Approved Rules Instead of Current Codex Rules? i know for Apoc you may use old models and the rules that go with them..i dunno would just like someone elses opinion on it, because if you cant use the chapter approved rules, he wants to know so he can "set the army up" the correct way Kenny
In short, you have to decide between you. There is no "Correct" answer. Most people will say you must use the latest rules, however, especially since there has not bee "Chapter Approved" for many years now, and all that material is based off non-5th edition rules.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/09/20 04:19:23
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/20 04:20:36
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
|
It's apoc, anything goes as long as everyone agrees to it ^_^.
|
"You're right, we all know you are."
Tomb World Fabulosa 18/2/6 (Supreme conquerors of Dash's dark eldar ) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/20 04:30:13
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
SamplesoWoopass wrote:It's apoc, anything goes as long as everyone agrees to it ^_^.
Which is no different to normal games of 40K. And by itself, this sort of comment is of no help whatsoever when someone is asking about the actual rules. Please see the sticky at the top of the forum regarding Apocalypse rules queries.
For the actual question, there is nothing outside of tournament-specific rules packages that says that players have to use the most recent rules. So in your own games, you could theoretically use any codexes or supplements that still 'fit' the current ruleset.
In practice, the older the rules you're trying to use, the more they're going to need to be tweaked to fit the current rules.
There is a common assumption amongst many players that once a new codex is out, the old one becomes invalid. While Chapter Approved is a little more vague, I think you would find that most players would consider the old Chapter additions to be out of date, as they were written for a previous edition of the game, and intended for a previous version of the Marine codex.
So, ultimately, if you're looking at this for home games, or games with a specific, regular group of people, your best bet is to discuss amongst the group which rules you are all going to consider valid for use. If you're looking at it for pick-up games (which Apocalypse really isn't suited to), you would probably be better off sticking with the current Marine codex to save potential drama.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/20 04:48:03
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Stinky Spore
Pittsburgh PA
|
I really apperciate the Quick reply and help guys
|
If you're ever in Pittsburgh PA, Come play with the Bakery Crew Gaming Club.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/20 08:40:22
Subject: Re:Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Power-Hungry Cultist of Tzeentch
northamptonshire, england
|
just had a look at my copy of chapter aproved 2003 no white scars and i don't have the older ones but... if he actually owns the right one and actually brings it, it's perfectly ok outside of tournaments as long as the opponent (you in this case) agree
|
tyranids only want to give you a hug, it isn't their fault they are cursed with extremely sharp and pointy claws. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/20 09:57:05
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
The chapter approved white scars list was written for 3rd edition.
If you guys are okay with him using it then it's okay. I suggest you all have a good read of it and see what you think.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 20:50:37
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
|
insaniak wrote:SamplesoWoopass wrote:It's apoc, anything goes as long as everyone agrees to it ^_^.
Which is no different to normal games of 40K. And by itself, this sort of comment is of no help whatsoever when someone is asking about the actual rules. Please see the sticky at the top of the forum regarding Apocalypse rules queries.
For the actual question, there is nothing outside of tournament-specific rules packages that says that players have to use the most recent rules. So in your own games, you could theoretically use any codexes or supplements that still 'fit' the current ruleset.
In practice, the older the rules you're trying to use, the more they're going to need to be tweaked to fit the current rules.
There is a common assumption amongst many players that once a new codex is out, the old one becomes invalid. While Chapter Approved is a little more vague, I think you would find that most players would consider the old Chapter additions to be out of date, as they were written for a previous edition of the game, and intended for a previous version of the Marine codex.
So, ultimately, if you're looking at this for home games, or games with a specific, regular group of people, your best bet is to discuss amongst the group which rules you are all going to consider valid for use. If you're looking at it for pick-up games (which Apocalypse really isn't suited to), you would probably be better off sticking with the current Marine codex to save potential drama.
So, ultimately, what we said was identical but my explanation was shorter and easier to read. Very interesting, very interesting indeed.
|
"You're right, we all know you are."
Tomb World Fabulosa 18/2/6 (Supreme conquerors of Dash's dark eldar ) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 21:02:46
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
I voted no, however...
Your friend could use the blank formation template and create a cross between the Khan list in the current SM codex and one of the Ork formations, Kult of Speed comes to mind. That way, current rules are used and costs work better with current edition balance. Probably more fun anyway!
Homer
|
The only "hobby" GW is interested in is lining their pockets with your money.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 21:09:37
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
SamplesoWoopass wrote:So, ultimately, what we said was identical ...
What we said was not even close to being identical.
If you really feel the need to discuss this further, take it to PM.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 00:15:42
Subject: Re:Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Only if he'd be ok with me using BBB Eldar.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 05:47:21
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
I'd be inclined to tell him to use the most recent ruleset for his army. If he wants to use the old Index Astartes list, then he'd at least need to use the Space Marine codex for which the list was written, which had more expensive bikes anyway, IIRC.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 06:56:23
Subject: Can you used chapter Approved rules in Apoc INSTEAD of Current Codex rules?
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
I voted yes, as I realized a while ago (when i was running my own bike list) that most people wouldn't mind if you just used the old CA rules, called them a "Datasheet" and made the cost 200 points plus models.....
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|