Switch Theme:

Assault Ramps?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in nz
Major




Middle Earth

In the SM codex there is a special rule allowing models in a Land Raider to assault when it moves. However in the BT codex there is no such rule, just a reference to an assault ramp. Do BT players not get to assault from a moving Land Raider? Or is this assault ramp something left over from a previous edition?

We're watching you... scum. 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Left over from a prior edition.

RAW you cannot assault out of a moving BT LR. However I have yet to see this denied to someone at any tournament, and in friendly games simply come to an agreement beforehand.
   
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







EmilCrane wrote:In the SM codex there is a special rule allowing models in a Land Raider to assault when it moves. However in the BT codex there is no such rule, just a reference to an assault ramp. Do BT players not get to assault from a moving Land Raider? Or is this assault ramp something left over from a previous edition?
Yup, BT LR can't be assaulted from.

Sucks? Yes. Them's the rules however.

See guys, it's not just me who sees these things.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/10/11 11:33:32


Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!)
 
   
Made in nz
Major




Middle Earth

nosferatu1001 wrote:Left over from a prior edition.

RAW you cannot assault out of a moving BT LR. However I have yet to see this denied to someone at any tournament, and in friendly games simply come to an agreement beforehand.


That sucks

Guess I'll have to work it out with opponents and tournament staff when.

Bloody hell, why does GW not see these things?

We're watching you... scum. 
   
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







EmilCrane wrote:
nosferatu1001 wrote:Left over from a prior edition.

RAW you cannot assault out of a moving BT LR. However I have yet to see this denied to someone at any tournament, and in friendly games simply come to an agreement beforehand.


That sucks

Guess I'll have to work it out with opponents and tournament staff when.

Bloody hell, why does GW not see these things?
GW think that having a halfway decently put together ruleset is a stupid idea and that you should be able to work out things with your opponents like superbestfriends.

They are also staffed by toddlers and monkeys and their proofreader hasn't been out the toilet since 1987.

It wouldn't be so bad if they could just release decent Errata, not say their FAQs are meaningless and actually hired a proofreader who played the game. -shrug-

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/10/11 11:42:28


Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!)
 
   
Made in gb
Lord of the Fleet






Actually, I'd like to see them take on a proof-reader that didn't play the game.

As it stands there's too much that's assumed. (like deployment)
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

Gwar! wrote:See guys, it's not just me who sees these things.

It never has been.

The differences you have with other posters on these boards have generally been far more to do with application of the rules than understanding of them.

 
   
Made in se
Wicked Warp Spider






Ios

In this case, however, GW has actually "made a FAQ" about it; namely stating that if something doesn't appear to do anything due to out-versioned codex, then it doesn't so wait 3 years for a new codex.

Being an Astarte codex, it's probably not a long time until you get a new one, though.

I really need to stay away from the 40K forums. 
   
Made in us
Ship's Officer






Ah, but if you want to get into that discussion, the German BT FAQ has an errata that specifically states that it applies to both the German and English codices, which gives Templars Land Radiers the Assault Vehicle special rule.

However, it's not really worth arguing. The number of players that will actively try to deny you assaulting out of BT LR/LRCs is tiny. Hell, most players wouldn't even think to ask.

Ask Not, Fear Not - (Gallery), ,

 H.B.M.C. wrote:

Yeah! Who needs balanced rules when everyone can take giant stompy robots! Balanced rules are just for TFG WAAC players, and everyone hates them.

- This message brought to you by the Dakka Casual Gaming Mafia: 'Cause winning is for losers!
 
   
Made in us
Martial Arts Fiday






Nashville, TN

It's more of a dill weed detector then.

"Holy Sh*&, you've opened my eyes and changed my mind about this topic, thanks Dakka OT!"

-Nobody Ever

Proverbs 18:2

"CHEESE!" is the battlecry of the ill-prepared.

 warboss wrote:

GW didn't mean to hit your wallet and I know they love you, baby. I'm sure they won't do it again so it's ok to purchase and make up.


Albatross wrote:I think SlaveToDorkness just became my new hero.

EmilCrane wrote:Finecast is the new Matt Ward.

Don't mess with the Blade and Bolter! 
   
Made in nz
Major




Middle Earth

Xca|iber wrote:Ah, but if you want to get into that discussion, the German BT FAQ has an errata that specifically states that it applies to both the German and English codices, which gives Templars Land Radiers the Assault Vehicle special rule.

However, it's not really worth arguing. The number of players that will actively try to deny you assaulting out of BT LR/LRCs is tiny. Hell, most players wouldn't even think to ask.


I can probably think of one.... maybe. But I'm baking on them not asking.

We're watching you... scum. 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: