Switch Theme:

Tau: 1x 12 vs 2x 6man units  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Sneaky Chameleon Skink






Texas

I'll begin by stating I've yet to actually play a game. There are no venues for play in the town I'm in, so I'm mainly just into the modeling aspect. However, a new store is opening soon and is going to carry 40k That being said I've been doing a lot of theory craft. One particular issue was whether or not to field 1x unit of 12tau or 2x units of 6 Tau. Even if the units were fielded as 2x 6man, I'd still rlun them fairly close together to serve as a "virtual" 12 man unit. Splitting them seems to give the follow advantages.

(bear in mind point efficiency is not being considered as I'm happy with how they've already been spent. Also, all transports in the army are already claimed)

1. The ability for one of the two peel off if assaulted and set up for a rapid fire counter on the assaulting unit or try to drop back to the main gunline as opposed to the 12man getting locked up in fairly futile combat.
2. 2x shas'ui as opposed to one (giving an extra attack)
3. Unit division, for whatever conceivable reason. (holding an objective, minimizing casualties on one-off attack that target a single unit, etc)
4. 1x additional markerlight. (were fielding a skyray)

As I said, I've got no field experience yet, so I'm looking for some constructive counter points.
Thank you for your time. (pardon any weird spelling errors, I'm typing this on my phone ) ^^;
   
Made in gb
Sneaky Striking Scorpion





South Africa

What little I know about Tau won't help, but tactically here are a couple of issues with dividing:

Taking large amounts casualties from shooting.

25% of 6 is 2 models
25% of 12 is 4 models

This just means it takes fewer model losses to wipe out the unit. You get to keep the other 6 but it will be just as easy to kill those 6.

The same is true for the unit to be considered below half strength, 3 losses of 6 or 6 of 12. 6 of 12 is better in the long run.



This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/10/14 12:25:25


War is my master; Death my mistress - Maugan Ra 
   
Made in us
Sneaky Chameleon Skink






Texas

Sorry I forgot to mention Tau have the bondig knife which both shas'ui will be equipped with. It allows their unit to regroup if below half strength which I assume means they're pretty good at tactical retreats.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Burtucky, Michigan

Pros
its 2 units instead of 1. So you can shoot at different targets, or shoot together, as well as being 2 targets to shoot at.

cons
Its small units and small units are easier to destroy.


Id say when the store opens, just play test to see what way of using them you like best.
   
Made in us
Bloodthirsty Bloodletter





Pretty often, Fire Warriors don't take part in the battle proper - in objective-based missions, the common strategy with them is to simply have them hijack a devilfish from a group of pathfinders and hide inside while holding the objective. For strategies like this, minimum-sized units are best, as if frees up points to spend on crisis suits or tanks.

If you're wanting to field a static gunline of FWs, though, you'll want to make the squads as big as possible. Ideally, you need to be able to completely annihilate whatever you shoot at, and the more fire you can pour into it, the better. Large units also allow for much more efficient use of markerlights, improving your army's overall efficacy.

In the grim darkness of the far future, there are only rules disputes.

Ellandornia Craftworld
Heirs to Oblivion
The Host of a Thousand Screams
The Fighting 54th Necromundan Hive Rats

=====Begin Dakka Geek Code=====
DS:80S++G++MB+I--Pw40k96/re+D+++A+++/fWD196R++T(T)DM+
======End Dakka Geek Code======

 
   
Made in us
Sniveling Snotling



Plymouth Michigan

It really depends on what you want to do. To be completely honest, I can't see myself bringing any firewarriors without a devilfish to put them in. If I wanted more troops to footslog, I would just bring kroot
For the price of 12 firewarriors I could bring 12 kroot and 6 kroot hounds
Same number of shots(technically a bit fewer because Kroot have a shorter range), the kroot get decent cover saves depending on your terrain, you get more wounds before the good bits die, and you can almost hold your own in close combat, plus the infiltrate ability make kroot far superior for footslogging Tau. I would honestly just spend that 120 points on vehicle-less tau on either a broadside with some drones or kroot if you really want that scoring unit.

1800 1250
Hello Guardsmen, look at your Leman, now back to mine, now back to your Leman, now back to mine. Sadly, your Leman isn't mine, but if they stopped using standard engines and switched to Lucifer Pattern, they could move like they're mine. Look down, back up. Where are you? Your in a battlefield with the Rhino your Leman could move like. Whats in your hand, back at me, I have it, it's the fire control for the Twin-linked Assault Cannons aimed at you. Look again, it's a Deep-Striked Land-Raider. Anything is possible when your Tanks move like Blood Angels, and not like Guardsmen. I'm on a Baneblade.
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: