Switch Theme:

Baal Predator - assault cannon or flamestorm  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Tower of Power






Cannock

So the funky new Baal Predator, would you take the assault cannon to kill a few infantry and maybe pop a vehicle or go in face with the fearsome flamestorm but exposing yourself to melta.

Answers on a postcard how and why like which turret weapon

Thanks

warhammer 40,000 tactica and hobby blog - www.imperiusdominatus.com

Want list feedback and advice? e-mail imperiusdominatus@live.co.uk

Blood Angels - 2000 Iron Warriors - 2000 Orks -2000 Imperial Guard - 2000
Eldar - 2000 Hive Fleet Krakken - 2000 Dark Eldar - 2000 Necrons - 2000 Grey Knights - 2000 Daemons - 2000 Ravenwing - 2000 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Assault Cannon is better in every practical way.

First, it shoots 3x as far.

Second, Assault Cannons do a fair job killing light armored vehicles. So less having to punch things with your guys.

The only thing a Flamestorm does better is killed wadded up hordes. Last time I checked, Blood Angels assault forces had no troubles with wiping out such things with their non-vehicle units. They do have some issues killing transports and getting to their juicy centers. Assault Cannons fix that.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in gb
Tower of Power






Cannock

Wouldn't a assault cannon be the same as flamestorm is S6 and you're banking on getting a rending shot which isn't always going to do better.

warhammer 40,000 tactica and hobby blog - www.imperiusdominatus.com

Want list feedback and advice? e-mail imperiusdominatus@live.co.uk

Blood Angels - 2000 Iron Warriors - 2000 Orks -2000 Imperial Guard - 2000
Eldar - 2000 Hive Fleet Krakken - 2000 Dark Eldar - 2000 Necrons - 2000 Grey Knights - 2000 Daemons - 2000 Ravenwing - 2000 
   
Made in at
Deranged Necron Destroyer





Statistically, an assault cannon is better at taking out vehicles than a lascannon. So yeah, it is worth it for taking out enemy tanks and armor.

https://atlachsshipyard.blogspot.com/
Just a tiny blog about Dystopian Wars and Armoured Clash 
   
Made in gb
Terrifying Wraith





Training sheep, Stocking Urchins.

Assault cannon, as Irdiumstern said is better than a lascannon against tanks, and can penetrate any armour value, plus it relys less on what you roll, although admittedly it dosen't always rend.













 
   
Made in gb
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker





essex, england

Personally i prefer the assault cannon, but the flamestorm can be fun to play occasionally. i have magnetised and friction fitted my baal preds so that i can change from assault cannon to flamestorm and also the sponsons so i can have sponsons or doors and bolters or flamers on the sponsons. it a good kit to do all of this with.
   
Made in ph
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout





The flamestorm cannon Baal is like that hot chick with really short skirts trying to bend over to pickup something up. More often than not,its gonna be hit on =)

There are 2 kinds of Dakka members: People who just think the game and people who actually play the game. Which one are you? 
   
Made in gb
Tower of Power






Cannock

Has anyone used a flamestorm on the Baal?

I just think that the assault cannon is hoping to get rending to bust vehicles, which isn't always going to happen.

I'm going to put two in my list maybe and try the flamestorm then assault cannons and see which one is best. Because my infantry is only 45 I think the flamestorms would be handy for anti horde.

warhammer 40,000 tactica and hobby blog - www.imperiusdominatus.com

Want list feedback and advice? e-mail imperiusdominatus@live.co.uk

Blood Angels - 2000 Iron Warriors - 2000 Orks -2000 Imperial Guard - 2000
Eldar - 2000 Hive Fleet Krakken - 2000 Dark Eldar - 2000 Necrons - 2000 Grey Knights - 2000 Daemons - 2000 Ravenwing - 2000 
   
Made in us
Rotting Sorcerer of Nurgle





Yuber wrote:The flamestorm cannon Baal is like that hot chick with really short skirts trying to bend over to pickup something up. More often than not,its gonna be hit on =)


I vote for Flamestorm cannons because of the above.

This is a little story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.
There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it.
Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it.
Somebody got angry about that because it was Everybody's job.
Everybody thought that Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn't do it.
It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done.
 
   
Made in tr
Andy Chambers






Tampere

Assault cannons are better than lascannons agaınst av 13+, below that lascannons are better.

Flamestorms are nıce to surprıse n00bs wıth you dont know how scout works, but thats about ıt.

''Why are you movıng your tanks??''

''Its called scout movıng. Im poppıng smoke too.''

-Fırst turn

''OK, so I hıt 7 marınes wıth my template, woundıng on 2s, 6 wounds.''

''OK, so 3+ saves..''

''No, theyre ap3.''

'' ''

-Hıs shootıng phase

''OK, so 1 pen on your baal..''

''Ill take my smoke cover save thanks.''

''But you fıred last turn!?!''

''Read the FAQ dude.'' -gıves FAQ

'' motherfu***** Jervıs WTF ''

"Dire Avengers are even great in close combat, I mean, an Exarch with a Diresword can even take down a Carnifex!!"

EUROCHEESE - You can smell it.

 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




I have both, but always use the flamestorm cannon varient. First I have enough anti-tank in the army so I don't need a tank to shoot more tanks. What I do need is a way to get pesky Long Fang squads out of the trees in the back of the board. Your opponents entire gameplan chanmges when you outflank with the Flamestorm Baal. IMO it affects the game in a greater way than the assault cannon version does.
   
Made in us
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy




Winston-Salem/Chattanooga

Jabbdo wrote:Assault cannons are better than lascannons agaınst av 13+, below that lascannons are better.



'' motherfu***** Jervıs WTF ''


Not sure how you figure that. Yeah assault cannons rely on rending somewhat, but they have 4x the number of shots as a lascannon. And they're TL.
My vote is assault cannons all the way. Whether you deploy them normal, or outflank and go for side armor, then the assault cannons are beasts at AT.
Like others have said assault marines (or even tactical marines) are decent anti horde as it is.


 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





mercer wrote:Wouldn't a assault cannon be the same as flamestorm is S6 and you're banking on getting a rending shot which isn't always going to do better.

Even without Rending, 4 twin-linked BS 4 Str 6 shots are better than one auto-hitting Str 6 shot.

Plus, it does have Rending.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in gb
Tower of Power






Cannock

Well I don't think I need the anti tank as I've got 7 las/plas razorbacks, 6 meltas and 4 krak missiles. Horde I've got a few flamers, but my problem is small man squads which mass hordes will tie up or crush. I think for me flamestorm would be better.

warhammer 40,000 tactica and hobby blog - www.imperiusdominatus.com

Want list feedback and advice? e-mail imperiusdominatus@live.co.uk

Blood Angels - 2000 Iron Warriors - 2000 Orks -2000 Imperial Guard - 2000
Eldar - 2000 Hive Fleet Krakken - 2000 Dark Eldar - 2000 Necrons - 2000 Grey Knights - 2000 Daemons - 2000 Ravenwing - 2000 
   
Made in gb
Kovnik




Bristol

Assault cannon seems to be better in most regards, it'll knock out a walker, or equally ruin the day of any infantrymen who decided to zip out in front of it

Also, if your using the flamestorm, your gonna be alot closer than the Assault cannon, and I dislike the idea of a PF weilding ninja, or melta blast seizing the chance to ruin the paintjob of the tank.

Nerivant wrote:The Custodes are the reason Draigo is staying in the Warp.

ObliviousBlueCaboose wrote:I cant wait until i team up with a cron player an kill a land raider with a lasgun.

Black Templars- Nothing makes you manly like unalterable AV 14! 
   
Made in us
Perfect Shot Dark Angels Predator Pilot






flamestorm forces the opponents to deal with it. No one wants that flame all up in their guys so they take it out. I like the flamestorm for the imprint it has on the game as a whole
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




St. George, UT

racta wrote:flamestorm forces the opponents to deal with it. No one wants that flame all up in their guys so they take it out. I like the flamestorm for the imprint it has on the game as a whole


This is why I run 2 Baals with Flamestorms. Yes two. The enemy has to deal with them. Move 12" then flame something. P-fist and other such stuff has to hit on a 6. Yeah you can shoot at them in the side armor with melta and plasma, but those shots are now not going against Memphy. Who is rapidly getting too close for comfort.

Vehicle poping isn't an issue either as I run two devi squads. Yup you heard me right, two. My BA list is soooooo not typical BA. Catches people by surprise.

See pics of my Orks, Tau, Emperor's Children, Necrons, Space Wolves, and Dark Eldar here:


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: