Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I don't see why FW and GW can't just clear these rules distinction up, simply by issuing an official FAQ(or ERRATA) about 'uniting' their rules, the words 'expansion' and 'codex' are getting all this flak.
Anyway, to simplify things up in our LFGS we just agree on the points and give warning to our foe, adjust the list appropriately. Once we tried to use a baneblade against two LR Achilles (proxied via two godhammer pattern LR) in 2.5K game, it's for fun anyway (sorry no batreps, but the bane got a beating,it survived though, the opponent had a lone LRA left with one TL melta and TF and the other LRA got wrecked by the bane's demo cannon).