Switch Theme:

Creating a Frequently Discussed Topics subforum  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

So, someone posted in painting & modeling today, "What's GWS's ugliest model?" He was promptly (and politely) told that this was a recent thread and should do a search.

Here's the thing. The guy that told him to do a search was wrong, on two fronts. First off, I did a search for it, and I certainly couldn't find it. I tried "worst", ugliest" etc as keywords. The search functionality on DakkaDakka is not perfect, it tends to bring up more noise then signal. Please don't take that poorly, you guys do an incredible job overall and search is a difficult function. So don't take this as a complaint about search.

The second part he was wrong about was that, technically, there was nothing wrong with recreating that thread. I manually went back 10 pages or whatever until I hit November 3rd without finding it. As there have been no posts on it in 30 days, it's not considered Threadcromancy to create this thread. I think this is a problem, in that some topics really don't need to be recreated every 35 days. However, I also see an easy solution.

What do you guys thing about creating a new subforum called Frequently Discussed Topics? I'd like to see mods be able to move a few threads in there, which would then be left open permanently. Members could reply but not create new topics in it.

GWS (and others) best looking model
GWS (and others) worst looking model
How to strip miniatures
Best place to get low prices on minis
How to use resin
Recasting

Then, when one of these commonly posted theads comes up, a mod can drop a link and then lock the thread (in a friendly manner, without prejudice). It would allow members to participate in these sorts of popular discussions without them constantly showing up in their related forums. As an added bonus, the last thread, on recasting, would make any casting discussion or Inquisition type thread offtopic when it occurs!

Just my 2 cents.

This would eliminate people complaining that this was just discussed!!1! (even through the correct response would be not to reply to the thread, obviously that's not what actually happens).

 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in gb
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator





England

An excellent idea, you could also move the 'imperial armour - optional or opponents consent' type topics in there as well because I see those a lot.
   
Made in ca
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General






Its not a bad idea. Some contenders would be:

something "The missing two legions" something.

Ultramarines are gay.

 
   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

KamikazeCanuck wrote:Its not a bad idea. Some contenders would be:

something "The missing two legions" something.

Ultramarines are gay.


Not that there's anything wrong with that.

 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in ca
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General






There's something wrong with those threads.

 
   
Made in gb
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






London, UK

We discussed it in the mod forum for a bit as on the surface it is a decent idea. There are quite a few pitfalls though:
- The forum will be so large and general people will not check it and will still start the repetitive threads again and again, taking lots of moderator effort
- Long threads tend to go OT, and so a forum full of them would take a lot of moderator effort to keep clean.
- It is not really a big problem anyway, most dupe threads like that are started when the older threads would be necromancy if resurrected (and trying to post in them gives a warning of such).
- If someone posts a dupe thread in short time, use the mod alert button to get it locked or just ignore it. New users are going to always come in, ignore searching and rules and just dive in. Locking those infrequent threads is easier than maintaining a whole forum of massive threads and linking to them when required.

Check out our new, fully plastic tabletop wargame - Maelstrom's Edge, made by Dakka!
 
   
Made in ca
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General






hmmm
-Maybe just move the Threads in there?
-maybe relax the OT rule for those thread?
-
-Ya, I guess your right. I wonder if locking new user's threads discourages them though? Don't want to turn away new people yet its true that those repetative topics are exaperating for Dakka Veterans

idunno...

 
   
 
Forum Index » Nuts & Bolts
Go to: