SoB and Daemonhunters

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Wardragoon**

Well I asked GW a question about whether or not grey knights could have SoB allies and got this in response
"Greetings!

Thank you for writing in to us! Unfortunately, neither the Sisters of Battle or Grey Knights can have allies with the PDF codex updates. Keep in mind that Daemon Hunters are getting updated in April! Cheers.

Thanks!
Andrew Hall
Customer Service Specialist"
something to keep in mind people

**Kroothawk**

Guess it is time to let go of 3rd edition special rules

**BluntmanDC**

I don't know why GW removed the allies rule, as they actually make the condices useful and playable.

**Emperors Faithful**

BluntmanDC wrote:I don't know why GW removed the allies rule...

...as they actually make the condices useful and playable.

That's why.

**MechaEmperor7000**

Seems kinda stupid imo. From a business point of view, the Pamphlet SM Chapter Codexes, allies for DH and WH, as well as Dogs of War and Chaos Allies for WHFB would have made alot more money via sales of more codexes per person. Getting rid of requiring more than one book only made things worse, as now people who only want one army would only buy one book, and it made the proferation of Space Marines much much worse (since now there's different TYPES of marines, giving no incentive to move onto one of the xeno races).