Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2011/01/19 23:37:50
Subject: Chris Armstrong On Attacks By Former Mich. Asst. AG Andrew Shirvell
The thing is, you just KNOW the assistant AG deep down, wants to have a sexual relationship with the collage kid. But hes obviously one of those "strait laced" family men types that cant admit to himself he wants to have gay sex. The guy is probably going to pop, abduct the collage kid, have some weird fantasies met, and then kill himself and or the collage guy.
2011/01/20 00:47:18
Subject: Re:Chris Armstrong On Attacks By Former Mich. Asst. AG Andrew Shirvell
KingCracker wrote:The thing is, you just KNOW the assistant AG deep down, wants to have a sexual relationship with the collage kid. But hes obviously one of those "strait laced" family men types that cant admit to himself he wants to have gay sex. The guy is probably going to pop, abduct the collage kid, have some weird fantasies met, and then kill himself and or the collage guy.
Well, he is pretty cute.
But, I can see something like that happening.
2011/01/20 00:53:14
Subject: Re:Chris Armstrong On Attacks By Former Mich. Asst. AG Andrew Shirvell
Ill admit the kid is definitely attractive, but yea, if I were a betting man, Id put my money on that scenario. I think that kid needs to buy himself a gun, and learn to shoot it stat
2011/01/20 01:49:48
Subject: Chris Armstrong On Attacks By Former Mich. Asst. AG Andrew Shirvell
Stormrider wrote:There isn't one, and they shouldn't make laws preventing people from being offended.
We have a word for offence and a word for harassment because they're different things. This is the latter, and it is obvious this is the latter. Why and how you invented the idea that this was merely worrying about being offended is an exercise I'll leave up to the reader.
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something.
2011/01/20 03:06:13
Subject: Re:Chris Armstrong On Attacks By Former Mich. Asst. AG Andrew Shirvell
Stormrider wrote:I was commenting on Wolfuns asking about US law thanks. It is indeed harassment, and it's ridiculous.
What? If it is indeed harassment, why were you commenting on laws against being offended.
What's ridiculous, the actions of the asst AG, or that there's legal ramifications?
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something.
2011/01/20 03:32:25
Subject: Re:Chris Armstrong On Attacks By Former Mich. Asst. AG Andrew Shirvell
Stormrider wrote:The AG, he has more important things to be worried about in Michigan than a blog.
You don't think there's any consideration for the fact that the alleged was a former asst AG? That it's important to show your office doesn't tolerate that kind of behaviour?
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something.
Catachan LIX "Lords Of Destruction" 
