Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/11 03:06:35
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Guardsman with Flashlight
|
I was sure to post this here or in Other Games section.
I was running a Chaos Fleet vs an Eldar Fleet. He destroyed one of my cruiser causing to get a 9 on the catastrophic damage table. Which cause 3 Lance attacks in 3d6 range. My question is would his Holo Fields which give a +2 save protect him from that? I don't see how a hologram protects him from an AOE explosion.
|
3000
Unknown Space Marine: "Higher Gound! Negate The Advantage!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/11 04:14:46
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Fighter Ace
|
Holofield protects. It is a lance attack, thus holo save per rules. That is rules as written.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/12 03:39:14
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Do holo fields protect against everything? Or just lances?
|
Dont worry, Be happy
Play:
Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/12 13:47:18
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
They do not protect against anything that uses the gunnery table (I.E, weapons batteries and bombardment cannons). With these weapons, all the Eldar get is a left column shift. This leads to some counter-intuitive save opportunities for the Eldar; the ship explosion mentioned above is one example, Nova Cannons and blast markers are two more.
Pointy-eared gits indeed  !
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 03:18:22
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Actually, you are incorrect. Check the most recent BFG FAQ.
"Holofields and Shadowfields work essentially the same way in all respects. They save against ALL strength-based weapons, Nova Cannon shots, any ordnance attacks and any kind of hit and run attacks, ramming and boarding. They do NOT protect against hits caused by celestial phenomena nor any area effects such as Warp Drive implosions, Necron Nightmare Fields, Chaos Marks of Slannesh, etc.
Eldar and Dark Eldar must determine if they wish to brace against damage they may face BEFORE rolling their holofield save. When protecting against damage (except against weapons that use the gunnery table), Holofields roll its save once against each successful attack, whether it be from lance fire, ordnance hits, etc. In other words, its rolls once against a ramming attack, once against each Nova Cannon shot, and once against each hit imparted by ordnance attacks, Hit and Run attacks, etc.
Against firepower-based weapons such as weapon batteries, holofields only provide a right-shift modifier to hit unless specifically indicated otherwise, and it does not modify rolls to hit beyond the far right end of the table."
There is a newer FAQ (the 2010, afaik unreleased), which changes them a bit more. The above is the most common 'official' FAQ from GW (v1.5)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/02/14 03:19:47
Legio Suturvora 2000 points (painted)
30k Word Bearers 2000 points (in progress)
Daemonhunters 1000 points (painted)
Flesh Tearers 2000+ points (painted) - Balt GT '02 52nd; Balt GT '05 16th
Kabal of the Tortured Soul 2000+ points (painted) - Balt GT '08 85th; Mechanicon '09 12th
Greenwing 1000 points (painted) - Adepticon Team Tourny 2013
"There is rational thought here. It's just swimming through a sea of stupid and is often concealed from view by the waves of irrational conclusions." - Railguns |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 03:27:25
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ah, I got my right and left confused again! Thanks for the correction.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 03:31:02
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
can i have a link to current FAQ please.
|
Dont worry, Be happy
Play:
Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 19:25:08
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Fighter Ace
|
It is easier to give a link to the new FAQ2010 (which will become official) then the current FAQ2007 which is not on the GW website (daft noodles they are).
Link to FAQ2010 (and more drafts):
http://tinyurl.com/23nul8q
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/15 02:50:12
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
ahh thank you! so who wrote this and is it official?
|
Dont worry, Be happy
Play:
Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/15 03:37:13
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It was written by a group of guys called the "High Admiralty," which is basically the officially recognized (by GW) rules governing body for BFG. The FAQ they have written is a volunteer effort, but as I understand it has been submitted to GW for the official stamp of approval.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/17 01:08:32
Subject: BFG Rules question.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
ahh very cool thank you!
|
Dont worry, Be happy
Play:
Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
|