| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/19 20:27:47
Subject: Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
So basically, i play Black templars, and......you cant really hold objectives considering you cant finish a game without every single infantry unti in your army across the board. So to capture objectives, who is better the battle sister squad or storm troopers?. Sisters got the power armour, but being able to measure distances allows you to get alot of measurments of diffrent angels so (basically allowing you to cheat) get measurements for almsot ur whole army.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/19 20:29:42
Subject: Re:Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Slaanesh Chosen Marine Riding a Fiend
|
So you play Black Templars and sisters? And they let you pre-measure? What game is this?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/19 20:34:59
Subject: Re:Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
|
Noisy_Marine wrote:So you play Black Templars and sisters? And they let you pre-measure? What game is this?
Stormies have an upgrade where they can measure BEFORE choosing a target in the shooting phase, and I suspect he is using Witch Hunter allies. So, to answer the question, the game is Warhammer 40000.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/19 20:43:59
Subject: Re:Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Slaanesh Chosen Marine Riding a Fiend
|
Oh well in that case you need Sisters! They have power armor and FAITH points. You just gotta have FAITH that they will hold the objective (and a 3+ invul save).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/21 00:45:47
Subject: Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Sister Vastly Superior
Colorado
|
Just stay with templars? put your finger on the model claim you moved it .01 inches. It has now moved up to the number you rolled on the dice and is fine.
|
When in doubt burn it, then burn yourself for doubting. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/21 06:08:26
Subject: Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
IcedAnimals wrote:Just stay with templars? put your finger on the model claim you moved it .01 inches. It has now moved up to the number you rolled on the dice and is fine.
You can do that? Automatically Appended Next Post: Just read it, unfortunetly you cannot, becasue you have to move your units, and looknig in the main rules you dont have a choice if you decide to move them.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/02/21 06:13:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/21 08:18:02
Subject: Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Grovelin' Grot Rigger
USA
|
The move is a consolidate move which i'm pretty sure it says may move up to d6, so yes you can move it .01 to fullfill the requirement.
|
"Ah, the Breakfast Club soundtrack! I can't wait til I'm old enough to feel ways about stuff!" |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/21 08:41:36
Subject: Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
Or you can just sit a small squad in a razorback on your objective.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/27 06:07:37
Subject: Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
Brother SRM wrote:Or you can just sit a small squad in a razorback on your objective.
Thats like 140 point minumum, some thnig that a squad of stormies or witch unters can do for a third of the price. 140 points is a whole new tank, or a squad that sit and blast with a plasma cannon for 6 turns.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/27 06:12:48
Subject: Re:Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Bloodthirsty Chaos Knight
|
Just take a small 5 crusader squad with a heavy weapon and put them on an objective. Go to ground if they take fire to avoid the zeal move and get a 3+ cover save.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/27 06:53:49
Subject: Re:Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Australia (Recently ravaged by the Hive Fleet Ginger Overlord)
|
scubasteve04 wrote:Just take a small 5 crusader squad with a heavy weapon and put them on an objective. Go to ground if they take fire to avoid the zeal move and get a 3+ cover save.
This seems reasonable. Though if you ARE keen on Witch Hunter allies, Sisters do have more survivability for only fractional increase in cost.
|
Smacks wrote:
After the game, pack up all your miniatures, then slap the guy next to you on the ass and say.
"Good game guys, now lets hit the showers" |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/27 07:19:05
Subject: Re:Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Bloodthirsty Chaos Knight
|
Emperors Faithful wrote:scubasteve04 wrote:Just take a small 5 crusader squad with a heavy weapon and put them on an objective. Go to ground if they take fire to avoid the zeal move and get a 3+ cover save.
This seems reasonable. Though if you ARE keen on Witch Hunter allies, Sisters do have more survivability for only fractional increase in cost.
They still only have T3 IIRC, and since they are going to get 3+ cover, then toughness and leadership really only comes to play. Crusaders > Sisters and Stormtroopers.
Not to mention if you care about fluff at all, running allies with black templars is fluff sacrilege. They pretty much operate alone and distrust other imperial forces, even other space marine chapters.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/02/27 07:19:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/27 07:24:04
Subject: Re:Whos better for holding objectives, battle sisters or storm troopers?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
Australia (Recently ravaged by the Hive Fleet Ginger Overlord)
|
scubasteve04 wrote:Not to mention if you care about fluff at all, running allies with black templars is fluff sacrilege. They pretty much operate alone and distrust other imperial forces, even other space marine chapters.
That's not entirely true. Black Templar crusades have been known to either be at the forefront of entire Crusades (on an Imperial Scale) or inspire Systems/Sectors to field armies and navies to support the Templar forces at the forefront (both fighting at the front and cleaning up after the BT's).
Sisters are harder to justify given the vast differences in dogma, though perhaps your average sister is unaware of the precise BT teachings.
|
Smacks wrote:
After the game, pack up all your miniatures, then slap the guy next to you on the ass and say.
"Good game guys, now lets hit the showers" |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|