Switch Theme:

scoring in close combat  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Vallejo, CA

If a troops choice is in close combat AND it has a model within 3" of an objective AND an opponent doesn't, does that unit successfully claim the objective, or is it barred from doing so because it's in close combat?


Your one-stop website for batreps, articles, and assorted goodies about the men of Folera: Foleran First Imperial Archives. Read Dakka's favorite narrative battle report series The Hand of the King. Also, check out my commission work, and my terrain.

Abstract Principles of 40k: Why game imbalance and list tailoring is good, and why tournaments are an absurd farce.

Read "The Geomides Affair", now on sale! No bolter porn. Not another inquisitor story. A book written by a dakkanought for dakkanoughts!
 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Mesopotamia. The Kingdom Where we Secretly Reign.

I don't think the fact that they're also in CC has any bearing on it.

The happens a lot in my games against Orks and whatnot; we've always just gone with the whole RAW line of reasoning that if there is a unit within 3 it holds the objective.

Drink deeply and lustily from the foamy draught of evil.
W: 1.756 Quadrillion L: 0 D: 2
Haters gon' hate. 
   
Made in us
Rough Rider with Boomstick




Champaign, IL

I thought there was something about not being able to claim an objective while in assault, but I can't find it. Maybe it's just something I heard, not something supported by the BRB.

Look at your comment. Back to mine. Back to yours NOW BACK TO MINE. Sadly, it isn't mine. But if you stopped trolling and started posting legitimate crap it could LOOK like mine. Look down, back up, where are you? You're scrolling through comments, finding the ones that your comment could look like. Back at mine, what is it? It's a highly effective counter-troll. Look again, MY COMMENT IS NOW DIAMONDS.

Anything is possible when you think before you comment or post.

I'm on a computer. 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Mesopotamia. The Kingdom Where we Secretly Reign.

ElCheezus wrote:I thought there was something about not being able to claim an objective while in assault, but I can't find it. Maybe it's just something I heard, not something supported by the BRB.


Not to my knowledge, though if you can find something that says that I'll mend my ways immediately.

Drink deeply and lustily from the foamy draught of evil.
W: 1.756 Quadrillion L: 0 D: 2
Haters gon' hate. 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




There is no such rule, period.
If you are within 3" of the objective, are a non-vehicle troops choice, you score.
   
Made in us
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills






Manchester, NH

As Nos said. No restriction.

Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.

Maelstrom's Edge! 
   
Made in us
Heroic Senior Officer





Woodbridge, VA

Yep, no restrictions. It can be pinned, in combat, whatever, doesn't matter as long as it's not falling back. If it's on the table when victory conditions are tabulated, it's eligible to hold/contest an objective.

Don "MONDO"
www.ironfistleague.com
Northern VA/Southern MD 
   
Made in us
Sinewy Scourge





Long Island, New York, USA

It can even be embarked in a transport. If the hull of the transport is within 3" of the objective, the embarked troops can claim it.
Helpful to remember for that last turn tank shock!

I have found again and again that in encounter actions, the day goes to the side that is the first to plaster its opponent with fire. The man who lies low and awaits developments usually comes off second best. - Erwin Rommel
"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin
 
   
Made in gb
Pete Haines




Nottingham

Also, a Land Raider is about 8" corner to corner. With a troops unit inside, it can score two objectives that are 12" apart. Without a unit inside, it can still contest. (3" Contest range + 8.2" width + 3" contest range = 14.2" total)
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: