| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/28 20:33:55
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Had a game this weekend that started a heated discussion (or yell fest) at my flgs. Essentially i had 3 squads of combat squadded sternguard in front of drop pods. Essentially what happened was a person called an assault with abaddon and 2 lightning claw termies to the center squad now by my knowledge you must try to get as many models in base with the first unit before breaking to a second unit. he instead charged two lc terminators to the center squad and barely keeping coherency got abaddon to the second i argued that it was an illegal move but perhaps i was wrong i have drawn a diagram using paint.
Please let me know if you think im correct or if i was just making an asshat of myself.
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2011/02/28 20:37:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/28 20:43:22
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
You were wrong, sadly.
If you CAREFULLY read the assault rules, you will notice there is *no* requirement for ANY model, beyond the first, to make contact with the initial unit. None.
If you can move such that you maintain coherency with an already moved model, get into btb with an unengaged model, the assault rules could care less whether it was part of the initial squad or not.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/28 21:33:07
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Stormin' Stompa
|
With the larger bases on Terminators it's quite easy to multi-assault - 40mm bases offer up to a 30mm advantage between two units. By the look of that diagram it would have been less risky for Abbadon to declare his assault against squad 1 (as he was closest) and THEN move the termies. As long as he isn't exceeding his movement allowance or breaking coherency he's fine.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/28 21:38:30
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
If it were set up exactly as it is in the diagram I would argue that you couldn't move Abbadon first. The rules say to pick the model that is closest to the enemy and move that first. Not pick the model that is closest to the unit you are assaulting.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/28 22:00:32
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Read further:
"Move the model into contact with the nearest enemy model in the unit being assaulted"
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/01 03:30:04
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Right, but in the above diagram one of the lightning claw terminators is clearly closer to the enemy than Abbadon is. So that terminator would have to be moved first.
Edit: Obligatory rules quote, pg. 34 "The model selected must be the one closest to the enemy (going around impassable terrain, friendly models and enemy models in units not being assaulted.)" So if you move Addadon first, you then can't assault the unit that the little bit in front terminator was closest to without breaking the rule.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/03/01 03:35:45
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/01 04:49:54
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
kmdl1066 wrote:Right, but in the above diagram one of the lightning claw terminators is clearly closer to the enemy than Abbadon is. So that terminator would have to be moved first.
Edit: Obligatory rules quote, pg. 34 "The model selected must be the one closest to the enemy (going around impassable terrain, friendly models and enemy models in units not being assaulted.)" So if you move Addadon first, you then can't assault the unit that the little bit in front terminator was closest to without breaking the rule.
The OP seems to suggest that Abaddon was moved last...so I'm not sure why this is being nit-picked over. The assault sounds completely legal from what I can tell.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/01 04:53:54
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Well obviously because I'm an idiot who can't read.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/01 05:03:08
Subject: Re:Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
In your squads, doing the chainsword tango
|
Yeah looks legal. I don't know how this ended in a "yell fest", at a (f)lgs where you have the damn rulebook. The rulebook doesn't say anywhere "you must try to get as many models in base with the first unit before breaking to a second unit", and If you had spent a minute to read the complex assault rules, you probably wouldn't have had a "yell fest". You certainly have to get in base to base if possible with a model the unit is assaulting, but because he's assaulting two different unit... he gets to pick! as long as he's in coherency.
So since you asked it, yeah I'd say you probably made an asshat out of yourself if this turned into a yell fest, doubly so if you were at a gaming store!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/01 06:10:54
Subject: Re:Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
We play late at my gamestore on weekends after hours this arguement occured after some liquid courage at about 2 am. So yeah I prolly was an asshat but ill be man enough to admit my mistake and apologize thanks for helping clear it up.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/01 13:44:33
Subject: Re:Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Sslimey Sslyth
|
Jihallah wrote:Yeah looks legal. I don't know how this ended in a "yell fest", at a (f)lgs where you have the damn rulebook. The rulebook doesn't say anywhere "you must try to get as many models in base with the first unit before breaking to a second unit", and If you had spent a minute to read the complex assault rules, you probably wouldn't have had a "yell fest". You certainly have to get in base to base if possible with a model the unit is assaulting, but because he's assaulting two different unit... he gets to pick! as long as he's in coherency.
So since you asked it, yeah I'd say you probably made an asshat out of yourself if this turned into a yell fest, doubly so if you were at a gaming store!
I never fail to be amazed at how many rules discussions grow to a heated level when both players are mere feet away from both the rule book and the appropriate codices, but neither person seems interested in opening any of these resources.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/01 14:28:33
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
kmdl1066 wrote:Well obviously because I'm an idiot who can't read. 
Additionally - he COULD have assaulted Abaddon into the left hand unit (from the picture) unit first, then moved the LC terminators into the other squad, as you only have to move the first model into the unit you declared the assault - the rest just have to reach btb with an unengaged model, where possible.
From memory there has never been a requirement to assault as many models in one unit as possible before moving onto the next - hoeever there has not been a rule that a vehicle and embarked unit are a single unit, but some people erroneously think they are
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/01 18:25:14
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
I believe when multiple assaults were first possible in 3rd edition, there was a requirement to completely engage the first unit before moving onto the next. Automatically Appended Next Post: vaderx30 wrote:We play late at my gamestore on weekends after hours this arguement occured after some liquid courage at about 2 am. So yeah I prolly was an asshat but ill be man enough to admit my mistake and apologize thanks for helping clear it up.
Well, this context does make the error a little more understandable.  Good on you for doing the right thing, now.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/03/01 18:26:13
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/01 23:22:20
Subject: Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:kmdl1066 wrote:Well obviously because I'm an idiot who can't read. 
Additionally - he COULD have assaulted Abaddon into the left hand unit (from the picture) unit first, then moved the LC terminators into the other squad, as you only have to move the first model into the unit you declared the assault - the rest just have to reach btb with an unengaged model, where possible.
From memory there has never been a requirement to assault as many models in one unit as possible before moving onto the next - hoeever there has not been a rule that a vehicle and embarked unit are a single unit, but some people erroneously think they are 
Oh absolutely I'm putting my hand up on this one saying I must have been smoking something when I read the OP and looked at the diagram. I had some bizarre situation in mind where the assault only worked because Abaddon moved first because if he didn't they wouldn't be able to multi-assault and maintain coherency.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/02 17:19:55
Subject: Re:Janky Multiple assault question
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Thanks for all the comments guys I appreciate you helping me work this out for my own sanity.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|