Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/08 19:43:59
Subject: Taking non-troop units as troops?
|
 |
Most Glorious Grey Seer
|
I'm at work and won't be able to look it up for a while and was hoping someone here could provide some info. Which non-troop units can be taken legally as troops in their codex (via special characters, army lists, etc)? The reason I ask is because of the GalaxyGobbo deal they need to "unlock".
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/08 19:47:48
Subject: Re:Taking non-troop units as troops?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
For starters, Dakka is not a replacement for your codex, and we need to keep direct material from published GW intellectual property to a bare minimum. If you had questions about how or why certain characters made non-troops choices into troops choices, we could help. If all your need is a list of the non-troops choices that have the potential to become troops, I'd say we can't help you. Consult your codices. If you don't have them with you now, you can wait until you do.
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/08 19:53:40
Subject: Re:Taking non-troop units as troops?
|
 |
Most Glorious Grey Seer
|
SaintHazard wrote:...we need to keep direct material from published GW intellectual property to a bare minimum...
That would require the elimination of the Army List forum altogether.
All I asked for was the unit name, not a bunch of direct material from GW IP whatever. But it isn't a huge deal. Was just hoping to get this taken care of while I had time.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/08 19:54:51
Subject: Taking non-troop units as troops?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
We're not providing him with full on rules for codex replacement, the guy just wants to know if he's wasting his money or not. Plus he can just do a general search of the army lists to get an idea of what he can or cannot have for troops. It would help though if we knew which army you are specifically refering to, as there's quite a number of "non-troop" troop choices.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/03/08 19:55:26
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/08 20:04:45
Subject: Taking non-troop units as troops?
|
 |
Most Glorious Grey Seer
|
Oh, sorry about that. Was looking at Orks and 'Nids mostly because I've already got enough Dark Eldar and Space Marines to fill out two armies.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/03/08 20:05:03
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/08 20:07:54
Subject: Taking non-troop units as troops?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Nobz (by extension the Nob Bikers, but that one's pretty obvious given their lists), Mega nobz and Deff Dreads for Orks. For nids, only Tervigons.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
|