| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/19 06:14:06
Subject: Using Vendreads as standard Dreadnoughts?
|
 |
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
I'm thinking about starting a Grey Knights army and am interested in making it clear that my Dreadnoughts aren't just the standard fare. Therefore, I'm considering using the GW Venerable Dreadnought model, since I think it looks a lot more "Grey Knights" than the basic or Black Reach Dreadnought. Would you guys be fine with this model being used to represent a regular instead of Venerable Dreadnought, as long as it was clearly explained beforehand? I don't want to cause any confusion, but I think the regular Dread is a little too bland for the Grey Knights and would greatly prefer to prefer the awesome plastic Vendread.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/19 06:29:57
Subject: Using Vendreads as standard Dreadnoughts?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Dont GKs have Ven dreads already? In anycase as long as you dont have a mix of rules in your army (i.e both the Ven dread and normal dreads) then people shouldnt have a problem with it.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/19 06:33:59
Subject: Using Vendreads as standard Dreadnoughts?
|
 |
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Yeah, there would only be regular Dreadnoughts, so things would be internally consistent. If I wanted to field Grey Knight Vendreads, I would use this guy.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/19 06:55:46
Subject: Using Vendreads as standard Dreadnoughts?
|
 |
Mysterious Techpriest
|
As long as you make your vendreads yet shiner, no one has any right to complain.
|
DQ:90S++G+M++B++I+Pw40k04+D++++A++/areWD-R+++T(M)DM+
2800pts Dark Angels
2000pts Adeptus Mechanicus
1850pts Imperial Guard
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/19 07:23:28
Subject: Using Vendreads as standard Dreadnoughts?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I would be more than okay with it. Venerable dreadnoughts have the GK feel about them to boot, and I've been reccomending them as alternatives to the FW models as GK 'noughts for a bit now. Just do yourself a favor, try and see if you can wait and use the GK heads in the venerable nought to add that little bit extra
|
15 successful trades as a buyer;
16 successful trades as a seller;
To glimpse the future, you must look to the past and understand it. Names may change, but human behavior repeats itself. Prophetic insight is nothing more than profound hindsight.
It doesn't matter how bloody far the apple falls from the tree. If the apple fell off of a Granny Smith, that apple is going to grow into a Granny bloody Smith. The only difference is whether that apple grows in the shade of the tree it fell from. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/19 09:14:26
Subject: Using Vendreads as standard Dreadnoughts?
|
 |
Widowmaker
Perth, WA, australia
|
I don't think there's a problem
you just have to point out to me, that this is a Dread, and not Ven
|
So far
500 point of
750 point of
500 point
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/19 09:49:49
Subject: Re:Using Vendreads as standard Dreadnoughts?
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
It would work
But I'd use them as venerable as dreads are heavy support from what I cam see
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/19 10:21:31
Subject: Using Vendreads as standard Dreadnoughts?
|
 |
Hacking Proxy Mk.1
|
I really can't see any reason ANYONE would complain as long as you mention it before the game.
*also ven dreads in GK colours look awesome
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/03/19 10:22:02
Fafnir wrote:Oh, I certainly vote with my dollar, but the problem is that that is not enough. The problem with the 'vote with your dollar' response is that it doesn't take into account why we're not buying the product. I want to enjoy 40k enough to buy back in. It was my introduction to traditional games, and there was a time when I enjoyed it very much. I want to buy 40k, but Gamesworkshop is doing their very best to push me away, and simply not buying their product won't tell them that. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/19 21:39:37
Subject: Using Vendreads as standard Dreadnoughts?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Agreed, so long as the weapons are WYSIWYG and you warn your opponents beforehand, i can't see anyone having a problem.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/03/20 08:17:06
Subject: Using Vendreads as standard Dreadnoughts?
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
As long as regular dreadnoughts aren't mixed in there, I don't think anybody will have a problem with it.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|