Switch Theme:

Catachan or Fenris ?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter






Australia (Recently ravaged by the Hive Fleet Ginger Overlord)

Warboss Imbad Ironskull wrote:I didn't ask you to name something that woulden't try to kill you, I asked you to name something on Fenris that isn't deadly. Trees can be just as deadly as any predator.


"I didn't ask you to name something that wouldn't kill you, I asked for something on Fenris that isn't deadly."

That. Is priceless.

And apparently trees on Fenris are as deadly as the predators there.

On fenris not every fish can kill you either.

And where are you getting this tid bit? Because as far as fluff goes every type of fish ever mentioned in Fenrisian fluff can kill a human.


Impossible. There cannot be predators without prey, therefore there must be something at the bottom of the food pyramid to provide sustenance for these killer fish. The climate on Fenris is simply too harsh for humans to breed enough to be the sole food source for all these animals.
Made in au
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter






Australia (Recently ravaged by the Hive Fleet Ginger Overlord)

@Warboss: Where are the deadly trees on Fenris? BTW, if something can't try and kill you, it isn't really classed as deadly.

BTW, we do have man-eating trees here in Australia.

loota boy wrote:I'm calling this one for catachan. Half the population dies within a month or so of birth. Half of the survivers don't make it to the age of ten. And plenty more after that die too.


And tht's with the advanced technology at hand.

Made in au
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter






Australia (Recently ravaged by the Hive Fleet Ginger Overlord)

Fenris isn't even a close second when compared to Catachan. Imagine swapping the population of Fenris with that of Catchan. The people of Catachan would probably handle themselves pretty well once they got used to the cold, compared to home it'd be a holiday. As for the Fenrisians? They'd last 30 minutes at most.
Made in au
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter






Australia (Recently ravaged by the Hive Fleet Ginger Overlord)

It's well established that Catachan takes the cake, and I don't see why people are still trying to place Fenris as running second.
Made in au
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter






Australia (Recently ravaged by the Hive Fleet Ginger Overlord)

Warboss Imbad Ironskull wrote:
Emperors Faithful wrote:@Warboss: Where are the deadly trees on Fenris? BTW, if something can't try and kill you, it isn't really classed as deadly.


umm no that's not how it works, one thing actually trying to kill another does not make it deadly it just shows intent to kill. A 3 year old with a rubber duck could try to kill someone that dosen't mean that he or she is deadly.

If a person slips and falls off a clif that's high enough it can be deadly, but by your logic because the cliff didn't activly try to kill the person it isn't 'classed' as deadly. A soldier inhales mustard gas and it kills him, but again by your logic the gas didn't activly try to kill him so it isn't deadly. Your statement implies that only something with intelligence (as only things with intelligence can choose to try anything) can be classed as deadly. Yet hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes, fludds, fires, landslides, avalanches, explosions, gases, temperature, starvation, dehydration and many many more things which do not have intelligence (or life for that matter) and do not try to activley kill anyone are all considered deadly.


Nice semantic arguement here. You done?

Anything that can kill wether it tries to do it or not is deadly including trees. So saying that Catachan is deadlier then Fenris because even the trees and other plants can kill you doesen't make it a harder place to live because on Fenris trees and plants can kill you as well and can be just as deadly. The differance comes when the plants of Catachan activley try to kill.


What exactly are Fenrisians doing that makes the trees deadly?

Because you're failing so far.

On Fenris when a child is born it's given an axe, if it dosen't grab the axe then it's killed because it won't be strong enough to survive and will use up resources.


Which is really dumb and superstitious when you think about it, and nothing like the natural way in which Catachan's are weaned out.
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: