vehicle and bike crashes?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Serder**

I've just read a battle report where a deff kopta crahsed into a wall. How can vehicle crash into walls (lets say a rhino and a deff kopta), where are the rules (Because I do not remember reading them) and how does it work!!!

Thanks

**Jidmah**

Move wounded kopta onto wall, fail dangerous terrain test. No "crashing rules" unless you take the apoc formation of 15+ koptas. Those CAN crash into stuff

**abaddon276**

The only way I could think of is that the bike ended its movement on it and failed its dangerous terrain test. Unless they were trying out some rules they came up with themselves I guess

**Kommissar Kel**

the only Vehicles that can "Crash" into walls; are skimmers moving flat out(Attempt to land on impassable wall, roll a dangerous terrain test, get immobilized, skimmer destroyed) or Orkk trukks that got a destroyed result(either value), then the ramshakle rules result was a "Kareen" and the scatter die+3d6 resulted in the trukk making contact with the wall(wherein it will stop and explode per the Kareen/Kaboom rules).

**Riddick40k**

Don't Kopptaz have two wounds?

**Serder**

i guess, they say they crashed when they failed the dangerous terrain test to make it look more realistic.

Since the jetbikes that result in a wound (for oks at least) result in the kopta being ded which leads to a "crash".

I remembered the ramshackle rule of the trucks, but I saw people saying the vehicle "crashed" in a wall when the vehicle was a rhino, lol. Guess there was a dangerous terrain test somewhere there.

thanks for the answers, I was afraid me and my freinds were not applying soem rules

Automatically Appended Next Post:

Riddick40k wrote:Don't Kopptaz have two wounds?

not from i recall

**whembly**

Riddick40k wrote:Don't Kopptaz have two wounds?

Yes... they are 2 wounds model.

**Jidmah**

Riddick40k wrote:Don't Kopptaz have two wounds?

They do. Only Oddball in the codex, save for special characters. Everything else is either a boy or a nob.

**Riddick40k**

Jidmah wrote:
Riddick40k wrote:Don't Kopptaz have two wounds?

They do. Only Oddball in the codex, save for special characters. Everything else is either a boy or a nob.

Then why would the koppta crash? wouldn't it just take a wound?

**Ascalam**

Sometimes they just say stuff like that in battle reports to make things sound more cinematic

**Cheex**

Riddick40k wrote:
Jidmah wrote:
Riddick40k wrote:Don't Kopptaz have two wounds?

They do. Only Oddball in the codex, save for special characters. Everything else is either a boy or a nob.

Then why would the koppta crash? wouldn't it just take a wound?

Maybe the model had already taken a wound?

Maybe the player had (mis)interpreted the dangerous terrain rules as being a wound to the unit to be allocated as with shooting, and managed to fail two tests?

Maybe the model didn't "die", it just "crashed and suffered a minor inconvenience"?