Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

HQ
Necron Lord w/Warscythe, Res. Orb, and Phylactery-165

Troops
10 Warriors-180

10 Warriors-180

Heavy Support
2 Tomb Spyders-110
1 Tomb Spyder-55
1 Tomb Spyder-55

Could you shed some light on why you chose so many Tomb Spyders?

Not necessarily a bad thing, I'm just curious.

Monoliths are too expensive for 750 and so are destroyers for their output. Tomb Spyders are tougher and can poop out scarabs for wound saturation and at 750 can through out some decent combat damage. My wraiths also end up dying horrbly as they are not tough enough so i thought 4 tomb spyders should be enough to dominate something.........hopefully

I'm a bit concerned about the inevitable phase out, but there's really not much to be done about that.

I think highly of destroyers, but in this small list, I can see why they're far from an automatic choice.

Is it worth it to take out 1 spyder, and add more warriors? I'm still thinking of avoiding phase out here.

[I just looked through the Necron 'Dex again, and god do you guys need an update.]