Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

This is one of the few rules that are spelled out step by step. Each model takes a test, if the test is failed, that models takes the wound. the BRB says that rules for wounds and saves are covered in the next section, not wounds, saves and allocation are covered in the next section. The new FAQ even goes further to state that you cannot allocate wounds from dangerous terrain tests like you do in shooting attacks.

The new FAQ now states that the wounds will not be allocated to other models.

If model has one wound on profile and fails its test, this model suffers one wound. This model now has zero wounds, and is removed. No allocation

If model has more then one wound (example 3) on profile and fails its test, this model suffers one wound. This model now has minus one wound (2 wounds remaining). No allocation

I do see what you are talking about, and I agree that the DT does not explicitly talk about casualty removal. But if you have a unit of 10 models and only take 5 dangerous terrain test, and followed the normal process for taking wound like shooting attacks and CC, then you could then allocate those wounds to what ever models you wish. Since the new FAQ clarified that the wound is individual, and does not allow allocation, it is therefore removed from the normal means of wound allocation and model removal. I hope that makes sense.