Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/09 01:30:30
Subject: removing steadfast
|
 |
Skillful Swordmaster
|
Just need a some help with the rules for flank charges I understand that you need atleast 1 rank behind the first to claim the +1 combat res. But to "disrupt" the unit and remove its rank bonus do you need to have more ranks then the unit or just 1 rank behind the first?
Also when counting ranks for steadfast Is it all every rank behind the first or just every combat res rank ie capped at +3
|
Damn I cant wait to the GW legal team codex comes out now there is a dex that will conquer all. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/09 01:40:24
Subject: Re:removing steadfast
|
 |
Cold-Blooded Saurus Warrior
|
To disrupt, you need two ranks. Not two bonus ranks, two ranks. Using infantry as an example, you need the first rank of at least 5 models, then a second rank of at least 5 models. This will remove the extra rank bonus of the enemy unit when you hit them in the flank or rear.
XXXXX
XXXXX
The above would be enough to disrupt and remove any rank bonus the enemy might have when in the flank or rear.
For steadfast, you count all of the ranks of at least 5 (continuing to use infantry), and must equal or beat the enemy unit's number of ranks.
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
The above would be three ranks for steadfast purposes.
|
I suggest you don't believe anything posted by thedarkavenger unless confirmed by other regular posters here at Dakka. He has shown he is incapable of basic English comprehension.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/09 02:17:19
Subject: removing steadfast
|
 |
Skillful Swordmaster
|
thanks for the quick and concise reply =)
|
Damn I cant wait to the GW legal team codex comes out now there is a dex that will conquer all. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/09 03:10:26
Subject: removing steadfast
|
 |
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
Yes, nice work Davall. Model response for YMDC!
|
“It was in lands of the Chi-An where she finally ran him to ground. There she kissed him deeply as he lay dying, and so stole from him his last, agonized breath.
On a delicate chain at her throat, she keeps it with her to this day.”
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/09 21:47:39
Subject: removing steadfast
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Just to be clear, you don't even need 1 rank to get the +1 bonus for charging the flank, you just need to be in the flank. Likewise for the rear.
Ranks only matter for disruption and removing steadfast as Davall so nicely cleared up. Just being on the flank or rear is enough for the bonus.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/10 09:38:43
Subject: removing steadfast
|
 |
Skillful Swordmaster
|
thanking you sir =)
|
Damn I cant wait to the GW legal team codex comes out now there is a dex that will conquer all. |
|
 |
 |
|